Task Force on Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures (TCFD) Report 2025
Barclays Bank PLC – Asset Management Businesses


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
2
Contents
1.0 – Introduction 	
3
	
1.1 – About and scope of report	
3
	
1.2 – Senior managers’ compliance statement 	
5
2.0 – Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC  	
6
3.0 – Private Bank Discretionary Portfolio Management (DPM) 	
7
	
3.1 – Private Bank DPM Governance	
7
	
	
3.1a – Private Bank DPM: Sustainability-related governance	
7
	
3.2 – Private Bank DPM: Strategy	
9
	
	
3.2a – Private Bank DPM: Climate-related risks and opportunities 	
10
	
	
3.2b – Private Bank DPM: Scenario analysis	
12
	
	
	
3.2bi – Private Bank DPM: Capital market assumptions	
12
	
	
	
3.2bii – Private Bank DPM: Asset level analysis	
13
	
3.3 – Private Bank DPM: Collaborative initiatives	
15
	
3.4 – Private Bank DPM: Risk management	
16
	
	
3.4a – Private Bank DPM: Climate integration in traditional and  
	
	
sustainable strategies	
16
	
	
3.4b – Private Bank DPM: Principal Adverse Indicators	
17
	
	
3.4c – Private Bank DPM: Sovereigns 	
17
	
	
3.4d – Private Bank DPM: Investment risk oversight 	
17
	
	
3.4e – Private Bank DPM: Stewardship	
18
	
	
	
3.4ei – Private Bank DPM: Example of climate-related  
	
	
	
stewardship activity	
20
	
	
	
3.4eii – Private Bank DPM: Climate-related votes	
20
	
	
3.4f – Private Bank DPM: Third party funds	
20
	
3.5 – Private Bank DPM: Metrics and targets	
21
	
	
3.5a – Private Bank DPM: 2024 metrics 	
22
4.0 – Barclays Investment Managers 	
25
	
4.1 – Barclays Investment Managers: Governance	
25
	
4.2 – Barclays Investment Managers: Strategy 	
26
	
	
4.2a – Barclays Investment Managers: ESG integration in products	
26
	
4.3 – Barclays Investment Managers: Investment risk oversight	
26
	
4.4 – Barclays Investment Managers: Metrics and targets	
26
	
	
4.4a – Barclays Investment Managers: 2024 metrics	
27
5.0 – Calculation methodology 	
29
6.0 – Data limitations 	
30
7.0 – Principal Investments 	
31
7.1 – Principal Investments: Introduction	
31
7.2 – Principal Investments: Governance	
31
7.3 – Principal Investments: Strategy	
31
7.4 – Principal Investments: Risk Management	
31
7.5 – Principal Investments: Metrics and targets	
32
8.0 – Glossary of key terms 	
33
9.0 – Disclaimers  	
35


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
3
1.1 – About  
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) 
climate disclosure requirements, 
as set out in the ESG Sourcebook 
Chapter 2.2 (the FCA Rules)1, apply to 
asset managers, including investment 
managers, in the UK. The FCA Rules 
incorporate recommendations of the 
Taskforce on Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures (TCFD)2 and apply to four 
business units within the Barclays PLC 
Group (the ‘Group’). The legal entity for 
three of these business units is Barclays 
Bank PLC (BBPLC), which is the focus 
of this report. The fourth business 
operates from Barclays Investment 
Solutions Limited (BISL), which is a 
separate legal entity and BISL has 
produced its own report.
The investment management 
activity within BBPLC in scope of the 
FCA Rules for this report is carried 
out by (i) Barclays Private Bank 
Investment Management (Private 
Bank), the business unit responsible 
for the Discretionary Portfolio 
Management (DPM), (ii) Barclays 
Investment Managers (BIM) and (iii) 
Principal Investments (PI).
Barclays PLC published a Climate and 
Sustainability report within its Annual 
Report 20243 including disclosures 
consistent with the recommendations 
of the TCFD for the Group as a whole. 
Where the Barclays PLC Climate and 
Sustainability report is relevant to this 
report, we have referred to it rather 
than duplicate the content.
BBPLC 
BBPLC is a wholly owned subsidiary 
of Barclays PLC and is the 
non‑ring‑fenced bank within the Group.
Private Bank and Wealth 
Management (PBWM), BIM and PI
The three asset management 
businesses of BBPLC service different 
client bases with distinct mandates: 
•	 DPM UK is within the Private Bank – 
part of the Private Bank and Wealth 
Management (PBWM) division, which 
is one of the five key divisions in the 
Group structure. The Private Bank 
provides comprehensive specialist 
investment, banking, lending and 
wealth advisory solutions to some of 
the world’s most influential people 
and their families in the primary 
global wealth hubs and corridors. 
Assets under management (AUM) 
in scope of the FCA Rules for the 
Private Bank DPM is £14.8bn as of 31 
December 2024.
•	 BIM is a sub-business of Cross 
Markets within the Global Markets 
division of the Investment 
Bank. BIM provides structuring 
and portfolio management of 
investment funds and investment 
mandates that operate with limited 
discretion (including rules-based 
methodologies). BIM’s AUM in scope 
of the FCA Rules is £2.6bn as of 31 
December 2024.
•	 PI is within Group Treasury and 
manages the Group’s minority 
equity investments and, where 
applicable, any associated 
co-investments. The AUM in 
relation to the co-investments 
as of 31 December 2024 was 
approximately £273m.
As an asset manager, BISL is in scope 
of the FCA Rules. However, as BISL is a 
separate legal entity, a separate BISL 
TCFD entity report has been published. 
1 – Introduction
1 Please refer to the FCA Environmental, Social and Governance sourcebook Chapter 2 for further details.
2 Please see the TCFD and IFRS websites for further details.
3 Please see the Barclays website.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
4
4 Condensed organisational structure chart as of 
31 December 2024
Organisational structure chart4
Principal Investments 
Co-investment 
portfolio
Barclays PLC
Treasury
Principal Investments
Barclays Bank PLC
Global Markets
Cross Markets
Barclays Investment 
Managers
UK Corporate Bank
Private Bank
Discretionary 
Portfolio 
Management
Wealth Management 
Discretionary
Private Bank
(Business unit)
Wealth Management 
(Business unit) 
US Consumer Bank
Private Bank and 
Wealth Management
In scope of this BBPLC TCFD report
In scope of the separate BISL TCFD report
BBPLC is the manager of Principal Investments’ co-invested portfolio and the assets under management (AUM) form part of BBPLC’s overall AUM.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
5
1.2 – Senior managers’ compliance statement
We have considered our obligations 
under Chapter 2 of the FCA’s ESG 
sourcebook and confirm, in relation to 
each of the businesses we represent, 
that the disclosures made in this 
report, including any third-party or 
Group disclosures cross-referenced in 
it, comply with the requirements under 
that chapter5. BBPLC is the legal entity 
in scope of the FCA Rules and guidance. 
This TCFD entity report6 is separate 
to the Barclays PLC integrated 
climate‑related financial disclosures – 
please see the Barclays Annual Report 
20247 for further details. This report 
focuses on the climate-related risks 
and opportunities relating to the 
investment management activities 
of Private Bank DPM8, BIM and PI, and 
covers the overall assets managed by 
Private Bank DPM and BIM, and by PI (in 
relation to the co-investments).
Private Bank DPM, BIM and PI each 
provide asset management services 
and leverage, where applicable, 
policies, procedures and frameworks 
that are cascaded throughout the 
Group. There will be instances where 
specific Group policies will be applied 
across Private Bank DPM, BIM and 
PI. Where appropriate, there may be 
instances where specific business-level 
policies and procedures are applied by 
the individual business line. 
The reporting period for this report is 1 
January 2024 to 31 December 2024. All 
metrics and data are as of 31 December 
2024 unless stated otherwise. 
This is the second TCFD report for 
BBPLC. We will continue enhancing 
our approach to manage climate-
related risks and opportunities. The 
level of progress varies in each of 
the businesses in scope of this TCFD 
report. We have included TCFD-aligned 
disclosures where it is fair, clear and 
not misleading for us to do so. Where 
relevant, we have also explained 
limitations on our ability to disclose, 
and the steps being taken to address 
those limitations.
Jean-Damien Marie 
Global Head of Investments, Private  
Bank and Wealth Management 
John-Paul Booth 
Global Head of Barclays  
Investment Managers 
Gavin Chapman  
Co-Head of Principal Investments
5 Please refer to the FCA Environmental, Social and Governance sourcebook Chapter 2 for further details.
6 This report is separate from the Barclays Private Bank DPM, Barclays Wealth Management, BIM and PI client on-demand reports, where requested and required under the FCA ESG Sourcebook.
7 Please see the Barclays website.
8 The Private Bank operates businesses in Ireland, the UK, Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Switzerland, India, Dubai, Monaco and Singapore.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
6
2.0 – Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC
The financial sector has an important 
role to play in helping to address 
climate change and the global 
transition to a lower-carbon economy. 
Barclays’ ambition is to be a net-zero 
bank by 2050, aligning its financing with 
the goals and timelines of the Paris 
Agreement9, by achieving net‑zero 
operations, reducing its financed 
emissions and financing the transition 
– please see the Barclays Annual Report 
202410 for details.
The climate strategy for Barclays is 
underpinned by the way it assesses 
and manages its exposure to climate-
related risks. Climate Risk is a Principal 
Risk within the Barclays Enterprise 
Risk Management Framework (ERMF). 
Barclays continues to implement new 
processes, tools, models and data 
repository as applicable, whilst also 
enhancing its existing ones. The Group 
regularly reviews its approach and 
practices for alignment with regulatory 
developments and leading practices for 
climate risk.
As a subsidiary of Barclays PLC, BBPLC 
continues to support the Group’s 
commitment to achieve its ambition to 
be a net-zero bank by 2050, and in 2024 
continued to support delivery of the 
Group climate strategy. However, as 
asset managers within a banking group, 
the approaches taken by the Private 
Bank DPM, BIM and PI differ from the 
rest of the Group. The climate strategy 
for each business varies according 
to its specific capabilities and client 
mandates, including its approach to 
setting targets. Please see the specific 
sections of this report for the approach 
taken by each business.
BBPLC has a segregated approach 
in assessing and managing climate-
related financial risks and opportunities 
for the asset management activities 
in scope of the FCA Rules for each 
business. Each business unit is 
responsible for managing its own 
approach to climate-related financial 
risks and opportunities. Please see 
the specific sections in this report for 
the approach taken to climate-related 
financial risks and opportunities by 
each business unit. 
Membership of the BBPLC Board is a 
subset of the Group Board11. For further 
details on the governance of BBPLC, 
please see the BBPLC Annual Report 
202412. Climate-related risks and 
opportunities are considered within the 
governance of each business unit and 
not at a BBPLC level.
Each business unit has its own senior 
executive and/or management level 
committees where climate-related 
matters may be addressed. Please 
see the specific sections in this report 
for the governance approach taken 
to climate-related financial risks and 
opportunities by each business. Due to 
the different client bases and mandates 
for each business, they will each 
continue with the governance structure 
in place to manage climate‑related 
matters and will not be seeking to 
consolidate at a BBPLC level. These 
governance structures provide 
escalation paths appropriate for each 
business area and further oversight at a 
BBPLC is not required. 
As a subsidiary of Barclays PLC, the 
financial planning process for BBPLC 
is determined at a Group level. 
Barclays’ 2024 financial planning 
process included a review of the 
Group’s strategy, implementation and 
tracking progress on climate-related 
targets, as well as capturing a view on 
climate‑related risks and opportunities, 
which aligns with how other risks are 
managed. Where BBPLC is operating 
as an asset manager, within the Private 
Bank DPM, BIM and PI business units, 
it does not currently incorporate the 
impact of climate-related risks and 
opportunities into its business-specific 
financial planning processes for the 
AUM in scope of this report. 
9 Please see the United Nations website for further details on the Paris Agreement.
10 Please see the Barclays website.
11 Membership of the Barclays PLC and BBPLC Boards is partially consolidated in order to drive efficiency and coordination, whilst also reducing complexity and unnecessary duplication. As a result, membership of the BBPLC Board is a subset of the Barclays PLC Board. 
12 Please the Barclays website. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
7
3.1 – Private Bank 
DPM: Governance 
Several changes occurred in 2024 to 
enhance our approach to Responsible 
Investing and climate risk-related 
governance at PBWM. 
The Private Bank and Wealth 
Management Executive Committee 
(PBWM ExCo) is the senior executive 
oversight body within PBWM and 
replaced the PBWM Management 
Forum in May 2024. PBWM ExCo 
comprises the PBWM CEO, the Global 
Head of Investments PBWM and other 
senior management. The PBWM ExCo 
is responsible for setting and ensuring 
the effective execution of Private Bank 
DPM’s business strategy, inclusive of 
oversight of its Responsible Investing 
vision and goals. The PBWM ExCo 
meets monthly. Climate-related 
matters were discussed twice at the 
PBWM ExCo in 2024. 
3.0 - Barclays Private Bank DPM 
PBWM ExCo
PBWM Sustainability and Climate 
Change Committee
Responsible Investing & 
Sustainability Governance Forum
PAI as a Financial Market Participant 
Review Forum
Stewardship Meeting
Sustainability Assessment Meeting*
*Delegation follows formal reporting lines and does not report into the sustainability governance structure illustrated 
here. The Sustainability Assessment Meeting has authority to make sustainability decisions at a portfolio and 
model level.
13 The RICC was chaired by the Global Head of Investment PBWM. Members included Global Head of Investment Services & Product Management, Investment Strategy, Investment Analytics, senior portfolio managers and members of the 
Responsible Investing team for the reporting period.
3.1a – Private Bank DPM: Sustainability-related governance
PBWM ExCo has delegated climate 
change and Responsible Investing 
related matters to the PBWM 
Sustainability and Climate Change 
(SCC) Committee. The SCC Committee 
was operating from Q3-2024, replacing 
the PBWM Responsible Investing and 
Climate Change Forum (RICC)13. The 
SCC Committee is chaired by the Global 
Head of Investments PBWM, who is also 
a member of the PBWM ExCo. The SCC 
Committee allows senior leaders of 
Private Bank DPM to have oversight and 
visibility of climate-related matters.
Accountability for all investment 
management activities, including 
Responsible Investing and Private 
Bank DPM, lies with the Global Head of 
Investments PBWM. 
The RICC had three meetings in 
2024. Topics discussed included, but 
were not limited to, climate strategy, 
stewardship and the review of 
climate-related metrics. At the SCC 
Committee, two meetings took place in 
Q3-2024 and one meeting in Q4-2024. 
Topics discussed included, but were 
not limited to, scenario analysis and a 
review of climate-related metrics.  
Table 1 on the following page 
sets out some of the forums and 
meetings that manage and oversee 
sustainable and responsible 
investment related matters. These 
meetings all help support Private Bank 
DPM’s governance of climate and 
sustainability related matters.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
8
Table 1 – Private Bank DPM Responsible Investing Governance14 
Name
Purpose
Membership
Meeting frequency
PBWM Sustainability and 
Climate Change (SCC) 
Committee  
•	 Advisory Committee for senior management to review, 
develop and monitor PBWM’s sustainability and climate 
strategies and initiatives.
•	 Recommendations and oversight from the Responsible 
Investing and Sustainable Governance forum.
•	 Newly created in Q3-2024.
•	 Chaired by the Global Head of Investments PBWM. Members 
include the Global Head of Investment Services & Product 
Management, Investment Strategy, Investment Analytics 
senior portfolio managers and members of the Responsible 
Investing team.
Quarterly
PBWM Responsible 
Investing and Sustainability 
Governance Forum
•	 Review, develop and monitor the approach to responsible 
investing and sustainability.
•	 Escalate to the SCC Committee. 
•	 Newly created in Q1-2024.
•	 Chaired by the Head of Responsible Investing. Members 
include the Head of International DPM, the Head of 
Sustainable Portfolio Management, members of the 
investment team and the Responsible Investing team.
Quarterly
Principal Adverse Impacts 
(PAI) as a Financial Market 
Participant (FMP) Review 
Forum 
•	 Review and assess PAI in the investment decision process. 
•	 Escalate to the Responsible Investing and Sustainability 
Governance Forum and Bank Barclays Bank Ireland PLC (BBI) 
Private Bank Risk and Control Forum.  
•	 Chaired by the Head of Private BBI DPM. Members include 
the investment team, Responsible Investing team and the 
Compliance function.
Quarterly
Sustainability Assessment 
Meeting (SAM)
•	 Assess the sustainability of new and existing investments.
•	 Discuss investment stewardship actions related to the 
sustainability of investments. 
•	 Chaired by the Head of Sustainable Portfolio Management. 
Participation in SAM includes members of the Multi-Asset 
DPM and Responsible Investing team.
Weekly
Stewardship Meeting
•	 Review, develop and monitor the approach to Stewardship.
•	 Chaired by the Stewardship Lead. Members include 
the investment team, Responsible Investing team and 
Legal function.
Quarterly
14 Table 1 reflects the governance structure as of 31 December 2024. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
9
3.2 - Private Bank DPM: Strategy 
At the Private Bank DPM, climate risk 
considerations are integrated into its 
approach to Responsible Investing. All 
the Private Bank DPM strategies seek 
to deliver competitive investment 
returns for clients and to create long-
term value for stakeholders. Private 
Bank DPM believes that Responsible 
Investing helps it achieve this. This is 
a contributing element in meeting the 
Private Bank DPM’s fiduciary duties 
towards its clients. 
As a long-term investor, Private Bank 
DPM believes material ESG issues, 
including climate change, can impact 
portfolio returns, and so are relevant 
considerations in managing risk 
effectively and delivering successful 
investing outcomes for its clients.
Understanding how businesses are, for 
example, impacting the environment, 
engaging with employees and key 
stakeholders, and practicing good 
governance, helps the Private Bank 
DPM assess how well these businesses 
are positioned, now and for the future. 
As such, Private Bank DPM believes 
ESG issues, where material, cannot be 
separated from investment decisions. 
Broadly, Private Bank DPM:
•	 Aims to identify, manage and 
mitigate ESG risks that could 
impact the financial or operational 
performance of a business such that 
it thinks they may materially impact 
long-term investment returns. 
•	 Believes ESG risks can also be 
mitigated and monitored through its 
stewardship practices. 
•	 Regards Responsible Investing as a 
contributing element in meeting its 
fiduciary duties towards its clients. 
These beliefs align with Barclays’ 
values of Respect, Integrity, Service, 
Excellence and Stewardship which 
apply across Barclays, including to the 
Private Bank DPM.
More details on the Private Bank DPM’s 
approach to Responsible Investing 
can be found in the RI Policy15. Within 
the Private Bank DPM due diligence 
approach, the risks associated with 
climate change are considered. This 
is reflected in the ESG integration 
approaches for the Private Bank 
DPM strategies. 
Private Bank DPM has incorporated 
climate-related  financial risks and 
opportunities into its assessment 
of macroeconomic projections and 
expected asset class risks and returns. 
This feeds into the strategic asset 
allocation process16. Private Bank 
DPM is a member of the Institutional 
Investors Group on Climate Change 
(IIGCC)17 and continues to engage and 
collaborate on approaches to address 
climate change. See further details in 
section 3.3.
Private Bank DPM recognises 
the importance of engaging with 
companies to positively influence their 
long-term management of material 
ESG risks, including climate matters. 
Through the Private Bank DPM 
partnership with EOS at Federated 
Hermes (EOS)18, it seeks to engage 
with investee companies on key issues 
related to climate. EOS’s engagement 
on the topic of climate change 
encourages company strategies and 
actions to be aligned to limit climate 
change to below 2°C and pursue efforts 
towards 1.5°C while building resilience 
to the future physical risks of climate 
change. See further details below in 
section 3.4e. 
With the evolving regulations, the 
Horizon scanning team in PBWM 
identifies and assesses how mandated 
regulatory change could have an 
impact on PBWM products, processes 
and services. 
Global political and societal changes 
continued to present challenges 
throughout 2024 to the Group as a 
global institution and therefore to 
PBWM. This has led to the Private 
Bank DPM requiring further time 
to assess a possible target for its 
sustainable strategies19. 
The Private Bank DPM investment 
team, supported by the dedicated 
PBWM Responsible Investing team, is 
involved in managing and evaluating 
ESG and climate-related risks and 
opportunities as part of the strategy 
for Private Bank DPM. The role of the 
Responsible Investing team is to advise, 
guide and upskill teams in PBWM on 
Responsible Investing practices and 
to provide subject matter expertise. 
The Responsible Investing team has 
a climate change specialist leading 
and supporting climate‑related 
work. Two dedicated ESG analysts 
are part of the Private Bank DPM 
investment team, supporting ESG 
and climate assessments in the 
investment process.
15 Please see the Private Bank DPM website for details on its Responsible Investing policy.
16 Please see the Private Bank DPM: Capital market assumptions section 3.2bi for further details.
17 Please see the IIGCC website for further details.
18 Please see the Private Bank DPM: Stewardship section 3.4e for further details.
19 Please see section 3.4a for details on its sustainable strategies.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
10
3.2a – Private Bank DPM: Climate-related risks and opportunities 
Physical and transition risks
Climate physical risks manifest as 
chronic and acute risks. Chronic risks 
are longer-term shifts in climate 
patterns and become evident slowly 
over time and may cause business 
interruptions. Acute risks are event-
driven from catastrophic events, such 
as coastal floods or tropical cyclones. 
Transition risks are the risks associated 
with transitioning to a lower-carbon 
economy. These include regulatory and 
technology changes. Transition risks 
are expected to occur in all periods, but 
more broadly over the medium term. 
Looking to the longer term, the 
cumulative effects of global 
temperature rise are likely to become 
increasingly pronounced, influencing 
ecosystems, sea levels and societal 
structures. Climate change can also 
trigger tipping points20 through 
feedback loops20 that amplify its 
effects. Certain tipping points are 
already under way, manifesting in 
observable changes across the globe. 
Different tipping elements, such as 
the melting of ice sheets or changes 
in ocean circulation, have varying time 
horizons. As the science develops, 
we are observing that some tipping 
points may run on a shorter timeline 
than initially expected. Accordingly, 
the uncertainty of exact timeframes 
in which the tipping points are 
expected to materialise adds a layer 
of complexity, making it challenging 
to precisely predict when impacts 
will materialise.
The potential impacts of physical 
and transition risk drivers will vary 
depending on industry, geographic 
location, business operations and other 
contextual factors. When considering 
climate-related risks and opportunities, 
Private Bank DPM has defined 
timeframes as: short term – 0–1-year, 
medium term – 1–5 years and long term 
– 5–30 years. These timescales are 
aligned to the categorisation used by 
Barclays21. Private Bank DPM reviewed 
climate-related risks and opportunities 
and the associated financial impacts for 
the AUM in scope of this report, as well 
as for Private Bank DPM as a business. 
20 Please see Glossary of key terms.
21 Please see the Barclays Annual Report 2024 for further details


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
11
Table 2 – Climate-related risks
Risk
Example risk description
Time horizon
Example potential financial impacts
Magnitude of 
impact
Likelihood
Transition risks
An increasing and evolving regulatory 
environment impacting existing and 
new products.
Short to medium 
term 
Business impact: Change in client preferences. 
Reduced revenue and assets.
AUM impact: Reduced demand for products 
and services.
Significant
High
Reputation-driven – shifts in client behaviour.
Barclays wider activities have a negative effect 
on our ability to win inflows.
Medium to long term
Business impact: Increase in operational costs 
in terms of time, resources and compliance to 
meet regulatory reporting requirements.
AUM impact: Reduced demand for products and 
services following potential regulatory fines.
Significant
High
Market-driven – shifts in client behaviour.
Clients shift preference away from traditional 
products (potentially offset by retaining AUM in 
sustainable strategies).
Medium to long term
Business impact: Negative impact on revenue 
and assets.
AUM impact: Change in portfolios and 
composition affecting asset valuations. Reduced 
demand for products and services.
High
High
Abrupt reduction in AUM value because of 
climate transition shocks.
Radical policy response impacting markets 
negatively. Portfolios are not fully diversified or 
aligned to net zero.
Medium to long term
Business impact: Unable to adapt products and 
services to market shocks. Reduced revenue and 
assets.
AUM impact: Reduced demand for products and 
services.
Significant
Medium
Physical risks
Increased severity of extreme weather events 
impacting the value of AUM.
Long term
Medium
High
Abrupt reduction in AUM value because of 
climate physical shocks. Climate tipping points 
collapse and impact global supply chains.
Long term
High
High


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
12
Table 3 – Climate-related opportunities
Opportunity 
Example opportunity description
Time horizon
Example financial impact
Resource efficiency 
Development and expansion of sustainable products.
Short-to-medium term
Business impact: Increased revenue and assets.
AUM impact: Increased demand for products and services.
Products and services
Development and expansion of sustainable products.
Focus growth on sustainable strategy and alignment to the 
goals of the Paris Agreement.
Medium term
Resilience
Development of sophisticated scenario analysis that is 
integrated into the investment decision-making process. 
Long term
Business impact: Asset protection and creating a 
competitive advantage.
AUM impact: Increased demand for products and services.
Adaptation
Development of specific adaptation strategies for capital to 
be allocated to climate opportunities.
Long term
Business impact: Increased revenue and assets.
AUM impact: Increased demand for products and services.
3.2b – Private Bank DPM: Scenario analysis 
3.2bi - Capital Market Assumptions
Private Bank DPM has continued 
developing its use of scenario analysis 
to help manage climate-related risks 
and opportunities. Private Bank DPM 
updated its long-term projections, also 
known as capital market assumptions 
(CMAs), and how they are impacted 
by climate. 
Private Bank DPM considers the CMAs 
as a set of baseline expectations 
regarding the likely macroeconomic 
path, and the return and risk 
parameters for a broad spectrum of 
asset classes. In 2023, Private Bank 
DPM first incorporated physical and 
transition climate-related risks into 
its modelling framework using the 
Network for Greening the Financial 
System (NGFS) Phase III scenarios22. 
In 2024, Private Bank DPM used the 
updated NGFS Phase IV scenarios 
– orderly below 2°C, nationally 
determined contributions (NDC)23 
2.3°C and fragmented world 2.4°C. 
Each scenario was given an equal 
weighting in the model. 
The analysis showed that the estimated 
cumulative physical impact of climate 
between 2020 and 2035 on global GDP 
was only c.0.4%. On an annualised 
basis, this figure becomes even smaller 
– especially for developed markets, 
which is the main geographical focus 
of Private Bank DPM investment 
strategies. In a stressed scenario where 
95% percentiles of the NGFS input data 
were applied to the CMA framework, 
estimated global physical damages 
from 2020 to 2035 rose up to 0.9% 
of GDP.
Transition risk is estimated to take a 
greater toll on the countries in scope: 
Private Bank DPM expects transition 
efforts to weigh by over 0.1% annually 
on the growth trajectory of the US, 
close to 0.05% for eurozone economies 
and close to 0% for both the UK and 
Switzerland over the next five years. 
This feeds into the strategic asset 
allocation process that underpins all 
the multi-asset class strategies. 
22 Please see the Network for Greening the Financial System website for further details on the scenarios.
23 Please see Glossary of key terms for details on each scenario.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
13
3.2bii – Asset level analysis
From a bottom-up approach, Private 
Bank DPM expanded its assessment of 
climate-related risks and opportunities. 
Private Bank DPM undertook scenario 
analysis to understand the resilience 
and robustness of the AUM in scope 
of this report. As part of its continued 
enhancements to climate-related risks 
and opportunities, scenario analysis 
was presented to the SCC Committee. 
This was to help raise the profile of 
scenario analysis as a strategic tool and 
to support the continued knowledge 
building of climate-related risks and 
opportunities in Private Bank DPM.   
MSCI’s Climate Value at Risk 
(CVaR) methodology24 was used 
for this analysis. The CVaR is a 
forward‑looking, quantitative model 
that forecasts the present value 
of future costs and benefits under 
different potential climate scenarios. 
The CVaR is comprised of transition 
risks and physical risks. MSCI considers 
physical hazards or perils that are both 
chronic and acute.  Transition risks 
comprise technology opportunities 
and policy risks. These can be broken 
down further: 
•	 Technology opportunities 
include modelling the prospects 
of transitioning to a low 
carbon economy. 
•	 Policy risks include modelling 
regulations from NDCs and how they 
will impact a company’s activities 
in direct and indirect greenhouse 
gases (GHG)25.
The TCFD recommends investors 
consider a set of scenarios, including a 
‘2°C or lower scenario’ in line with the 
Paris Agreement. We have chosen a 
range of scenarios (please see table 4) 
to help build our knowledge and how 
the AUM in scope of this report may be 
impacted under these scenarios. The 
NGFS scenarios of disorderly 1.5°C, 
orderly below 2°C and hothouse world 
3°C were used26.
•	 Orderly transition scenarios assume 
climate policies are introduced 
early and become gradually more 
stringent, reaching global net-zero 
CO2 emissions around 2050 and 
likely limiting global warming to 
below 2°C on pre-industrial averages 
and in line with the Paris Agreement. 
Both physical and transition risks are 
relatively subdued.
•	 Disorderly transition scenarios 
assume climate policies are 
delayed or divergent, requiring 
sharper emissions reductions, 
achieved at a higher cost and with 
increased physical risks to limit 
temperature rise to below 2°C on 
pre-industrial averages.
•	 Hothouse world scenarios assume 
that some climate policies are 
implemented in some jurisdictions 
but that globally, efforts are 
insufficient to halt significant 
global warming. The scenarios 
result in severe physical risk, 
including irreversible impacts like 
sea‑level rise.
Table 4 on the following page shows 
the impact of different scenarios on the 
AUM in scope of this report. The data 
coverage for table 4 is 52% for physical 
risk and 51% for transition risk27 for the 
AUM in scope of this report.  
24 Please MSCI’s website for further details on their CVaR Methodology. 
25 Please see Glossary of key terms for further details.
26 The asset-level scenarios are based on MSCI’s standard methodology for CVaR. These may differ from the scenarios used in the capital market assumptions.  
27 Transition risk coverage is given as an average of its two components. Individually, coverage for these components is policy risk 52% and technology risk 50%. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
14
Table 428, 29
 
1.5oC Orderly
1.5oC Disorderly
2oC Orderly
2oC Disorderly
3oC Hot House
Transition risk
-2.4
-2.8
-0.3
-1.0
-0.5
Physical risk
-0.4
-0.4
-0.5
-0.6
-0.7
Aggregated CVaR
-2.7
-3.2
-0.9
-1.5
-1.2
28 The aggregated CVaR does not equate to the sum of the corresponding transition and physical risks due to rounding up of the numbers.
29 Scenario analysis is based on the MSCI’s average expected outcome.
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
Climate VaR %
1.5°C Orderly
2°C Disorderly
3°C NDC
-2.4%
-0.3%
-1.0%
-2.8%
-0.5%
1.5°C Disorderly
2°C Orderly
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
Climate VaR %
1.5°C Average
2°C Aggressive
3°C Average
3°C Aggressive
-0.4%
-0.5%
-0.8%
-0.6%
-1.0%
-0.7%
1.5°C Aggressive
2°C Average
Transition value at risk
Physical value at risk
Transition and physical risks have 
been split to better understand what 
is driving the aggregated CVaR – see 
graphs. Transition risks are higher 
under both the 1.5oC orderly and 
disorderly scenarios, worse under 
the 1.50C disorderly scenario where 
sharper emission reductions are 
required. The 1.5oC scenarios have 
higher transition risks because carbon 
prices will be typically higher for a given 
temperature outcome.
The physical value at risk assessment 
was conducted under average and 
aggressive scenarios. The average 
scenario is the expected outcome of 
a scenario. The aggressive scenario 
shows the severe downside risk within 
the distribution tail of all outcomes. 
The results show that under all 
temperatures, aggressive scenarios 
have a more negative impact on the 
AUM in scope of this report.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
15
30 Further details on the Principles for Responsible Investment are available on its website.
Private Bank DPM acknowledges 
the value of scenario analysis, 
but also recognises that climate 
considerations are complex. There 
are inherent uncertainties largely 
attributed to the limited history of the 
interactions between climate risks 
and the economy. An understanding 
of compounding risks and feedback 
loops between financial systems, the 
economy and climate risks remain a 
challenge, given the lack of historical 
precedent of such interactions. 
Over longer time horizons, it becomes 
increasingly difficult to capture the 
range of second-order effects as 
physical and transition risks evolve, 
assess the rate in which risks manifest 
or subside, or identify inflection 
points. These challenges mean the 
resulting scenarios could inadvertently 
understate the potential range 
of outcomes. 
Private Bank DPM is dependent 
on investee companies’ ability to 
commercially decarbonise their 
business models, which is influenced 
by a wide range of external factors, 
including market developments, 
technological progress and its financial 
viability, a stable and supportive policy 
environment, regulatory alignment, 
changes to societal behaviour, 
geopolitical developments and 
regional variations.
Whilst there is lack of guidance when it 
comes to best practices, Private Bank 
DPM will continue evolving its approach 
to scenario analysis to assess and 
quantify the impact of both physical 
and transition risks. This will help to 
better understand the significant 
uncertainty that arises from how 
climatic weather patterns will change, 
as well as the rapidly evolving nature of 
the climate transition from government 
policies and new technologies.
3.3 – Private Bank DPM: Collaborative initiatives 
We are part of several collaborative 
initiatives that promote Responsible 
Investing practices. Through these 
initiatives, we actively work with and 
share our experience and knowledge 
with peers (whilst respecting 
antitrust and other regulatory 
requirements) to better understand 
important Responsible Investing 
issues and their implications for our 
investment processes.
Barclays Private Bank Investment 
Management is a signatory to the 
Principles for Responsible Investment 
(PRI)30, a leading global initiative in 
the Responsible Investing space. 
The PRI is an international network 
of investors, working together to 
implement the six PRI principles, and 
its goal is to encourage its signatories 
to incorporate ESG issues and 
stewardship via the six principles into 
their investment practices.
As a signatory to the PRI, we are 
committed to Responsible Investing, to 
evidencing our ability to integrate ESG 
considerations into our investment 
processes, and to engaging and voting 
to enhance returns and better manage 
risks within portfolio companies. To 
further demonstrate our commitment 
to applying the PRI principles, we 
are also a member of the interactive 
network of PRI Wealth Managers 
Working Group. The members and 
affiliated signatories’ goal is to advance 
Responsible Investment within the 
industry by collaborating and sharing 
insights of good practice. Furthermore, 
the Working Group explores how ESG 
considerations can be appropriately 
incorporated into portfolio managers’ 
decision-making.
Private Bank DPM has been a member 
of the IIGCC since 2023. The IIGCC 
brings together the investment 
community to work towards a net-zero 
and climate resilient future. Private 
Bank DPM continued its participation 
in the IIGCC Proxy Voting Working 
Group and newly joined the IIGCC UK 
Stewardship Code Working Group, 
engaging in discussions on aligning 
investor stewardship with climate 
considerations. Recent conversations 
within IIGCC Proxy Voting Working 
Group have focused on voting trends, 
investor reflections on climate‑related 
resolutions, and the evolving 
role of proxy advisers in shaping 
governance practices. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
16
3.4 – Private Bank DPM: Risk management 
3.4a – Private Bank DPM: Climate integration in Traditional and Sustainable strategies 
Private Bank DPM strategies are 
classified as either Traditional or 
Sustainable based on the different 
approaches taken for ESG integration31 
– please see the Private Bank DPM 
Responsible Investing policy for 
further details. The analysis and 
integration of material ESG issues 
and climate‑related risks as part of 
Private Bank DPM investment due 
diligence, help identify key foreseeable 
risks that may have a financial impact 
on the companies in which Private 
Bank DPM seeks to invest. Material 
ESG considerations, including 
climate‑related considerations, may 
be incorporated into the investment 
process to help mitigate these risks. 
Equity and Fixed Income holdings 
in Private Bank DPM’s Traditional 
Multi‑asset, Global, European and UK 
Equity and Sustainable Strategies: 
Proprietary ESG dashboards 
developed by the Private Bank DPM 
investment team, help identify and 
integrate material ESG and climate 
considerations into the investment due 
diligence for each of the companies 
held in the Traditional Multi-asset, 
Global, European and UK Equity and 
Sustainable equity strategies. The ESG 
dashboards include climate metrics. 
•	 Climate metrics include the 
company’s Implied Temperature 
Rise (ITR)32, fossil fuel involvement 
and net-zero flags33.
•	 A breakdown of absolute carbon 
emissions of the company across 
scopes 1, 2 and 3 and an analysis 
of carbon intensity, comparing the 
results across peers, help determine 
the relative carbon intensity of a 
company as well its carbon impact. 
They also help highlight any 
potential vulnerability to the future 
cash generation of the company, 
particularly from regulatory 
pressure regarding climate change.
•	 The dashboards include a range 
of theoretical carbon costs34 
to understand the impact on a 
company’s income statement and 
return profile. 
•	 Details of the historical trend 
analysis of carbon intensity to assess 
a company’s profile over a given 
time horizon. 
•	 Several metrics are included to 
assess a company’s ability to 
transition, including its supply chain 
power and influence and its ability to 
upgrade its assets. 
•	 The dashboards assess physical risk, 
calculating the potential market 
value loss across several scenarios. 
Also included are metrics relating to 
water, waste and biodiversity.
We will seek to continue to develop our 
dashboards as more data and research 
becomes available.
Fixed Income strategies: 
As part of the Preferred Investment 
Universe (PIU) process for the Specialist 
Investment Management (SIM) fixed 
income holdings, Private Bank DPM 
undertakes further qualitative analysis 
if a company is identified as having high 
carbon intensity, which is defined as 
scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions being 
more than one standard deviation 
above the respective peer group’s 
median carbon intensity. 
Detailed qualitative ESG assessments, 
including climate-related risks, may 
be conducted to help provide insight 
into the internal operational quality of 
a company, and its ability to mitigate 
against risks to future cash generation 
that may arise from ESG factors and 
climate-related risks. Private Bank 
DPM will continue developing its 
capabilities as more data and research 
becomes available.
31 While we incorporate the same approach in each of our discretionary strategies in all but one of the jurisdictions in which we operate, we may have portfolios with specific requirements where we need to vary our approach to our core strategies.
32 Please see the section 3.5 and Glossary of key terms for further details.
33 This includes data from Bloomberg on whether the investee company has a net zero strategy and climate-related data obtained from other data vendors. 
34 The theoretical carbon cost is based on the investment team’s views and opinions only. Barclays and Barclays Private Bank DPM do not have an internal formal carbon price.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
17
3.4b – Private Bank DPM:  
Principal Adverse Impacts (PAI) 
The Principal Adverse Impacts (PAI) 
as a Financial Market Participant 
(FMP) Review Forum under the EU’s 
Sustainable Finance Disclosure 
Regulation (SFDR), considers 
the principal adverse impacts of 
investment decisions on sustainability 
factors35. This includes climate and 
other environment-related indicators 
that are monitored on a regular 
basis. Investments that have seen 
a material deterioration on a PAI 
indicator are referred to portfolio 
managers for further consideration 
on the appropriate action to take. An 
annual PAI statement is published36 by 
June each year covering the previous 
calendar year.   
3.4c – Private Bank 
DPM: Sovereigns 
In Q4-2024, PBWM began enhancing 
its approach to assessing sovereigns 
from an ESG perspective within the 
PIU. Based on MSCI’s ESG Government 
Ratings - which provide an opinion 
on sovereigns’ exposure to and 
management of ESG risks – we apply 
different weights to the ESG pillars 
for sovereigns.
The different weights applied to 
sovereigns and sub-sovereigns reflect 
our investment views and are based 
on the economic classification of the 
sovereign (as identified by MSCI). 
For example, we perceive strong 
governance to be a foundational pillar 
for positive ESG developments. We 
believe that the environmental pillar 
should have a higher weight for less 
developed markets, since developed 
countries generally have greater 
resources to address climate change 
challenges. Therefore, we assign the 
largest weight to the Governance pillar 
for all sovereign issuers in the overall 
PIU score calculations, whilst weights 
for the Environment and Social pillars 
vary depending on the sovereign’s 
economic classification. Climate 
considerations are captured in the 
Environment pillar, which assesses 
a government’s ability to protect, 
harness and supplement its natural 
resources, and to mitigate and adapt to 
climate change and natural hazards.
35 This is applicable to the Private Bank Barclays Bank Ireland PLC (BBI) where in scope of this report.
36 Please see the Private Bank website for further details. 
3.4d – Private Bank DPM: Investment risk oversight 
The PBWM Investment Risk team is a 
risk management and control function 
that is independent of the investment 
management process. This team is 
responsible for the application of 
the PBWM investment risk process 
ensuring that in-scope products 
deliver a level of risk that is aligned to 
the risk profile of the client mandate. 
Furthermore, the team is responsible 
for the regulatory risk compliance of 
unitised products offered to clients. 
The Investment Risk Framework 
seeks to challenge each layer of the 
investment process. This includes the 
strategic asset allocation (SAA), the 
shorter-term tactical asset allocation 
(TAA) overlays, the stock selection 
process and implementation decisions 
in both client models and individual 
portfolios. The framework focuses 
on a defined list of key risk indicators 
and the implementation of guidelines 
and limits within which the investment 
activity can operate. These risks are 
mapped to the investment process, 
with risk ownership attributed at each 
step. Climate risk considerations were 
not integrated into the latest iteration 
of the Investment Risk Framework for 
the reporting period.
The Investment Risk Framework 
includes, but is not limited to: 
•	 The PBWM Investment Risk, 
Performance and Funds Risk Forum, 
which seeks to identify, monitor and 
address systemic and idiosyncratic 
risks arising from investment 
activity. The forum operates 
monthly, with ongoing reporting 
obligations to senior management. 
Its frequency may be increased 
should the underlying market 
conditions warrant greater scrutiny. 
•	 The Global DPM Governance Forum, 
a monthly forum which reviews 
non-financial and risk management 
information/key risk indicators 
and events.
We continue to evaluate how to further 
integrate climate risk considerations 
into the investment risk process. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
18
3.4e - Private Bank DPM: Stewardship 
At the Private Bank DPM, engagement37 
and voting38 are viewed as important 
mechanisms through which to hold 
management to account, and act as 
a lever to encourage best practice 
and change in investee companies 
on material ESG issues where 
appropriate. This is consistent with our 
business objectives and aim to deliver 
competitive investment returns for our 
clients and to create long-term value 
for stakeholders. We believe companies 
that can better manage material ESG 
issues could be less prone to severe 
incidents such as fraud, litigation or 
reputational risks.
Stewardship through engagement and 
voting is undertaken in partnership 
with Private Bank DPM’s stewardship 
services provider, EOS at Federated 
Hermes Limited (EOS)39. EOS is a 
stewardship leader that helps global 
long-term institutional investors to 
meet their fiduciary responsibilities 
and become active owners of public 
companies. This is a contributing 
element in meeting our fiduciary duties 
towards our clients.
The decision to partner with EOS 
was based on several factors, but 
not specifically on its approach to 
managing climate change. Their 
diversity of skills, experience, global 
reach and cultural understanding 
give them the gravitas and credibility 
to access and maintain constructive 
relationships with company boards, 
policymakers and regulators.
EOS engages on behalf of clients, 
including the Private Bank DPM, with a 
wide range of stakeholders – including 
companies, government authorities, 
trade bodies, unions, investors and 
NGOs – to seek to identify and respond 
to both company-specific, market-wide 
and systemic risks.
Through our partnership with 
EOS, Private Bank DPM takes 
a comprehensive approach to 
stewardship, engaging and voting 
with corporates and key stakeholders, 
such as policymakers and 
regulators globally40. 
The engagement and voting process 
is regularly reviewed and updated 
considering existing commitments 
and ambitions, the rapidly changing 
external environment (including 
changing laws and regulations) and 
is informed by engagement with key 
stakeholders and our fiduciary duties 
to our clients. As such, decisions are 
not solely limited to ESG/sustainability 
related factors or our membership 
of any voluntary codes or groups. 
Private Bank DPM’s stewardship 
approach (guided by our stewardship 
provider EOS) may differ across 
different regions.
Private Bank DPM believes in the 
engagement approach of promoting 
constructive dialogue with investee 
companies by building long-term 
relationships to seek to influence ESG 
and other practices that may impact 
our clients’ investments. EOS develops 
engagement strategies specific to 
each company subject to engagement, 
informed by its deep understanding 
across sectors, themes and 
markets41. Specific environmental and 
nature‑related outcomes, aligned to 
the UN Sustainable Development Goals 
(SDGs)42, that EOS seeks to include are 
as follows:
Climate change
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, 
where possible, in line with the goals 
of the Paris Agreement to limit climate 
change to below 2°C and pursue efforts 
towards 1.5°C while building resilience 
to the future physical risks of climate 
change.
Natural resources 
In addition to limiting climate change 
to safe levels, protecting, preserving 
and restoring natural resources 
and biodiversity by transitioning to 
sustainable food systems, avoiding 
antimicrobial resistance and managing 
water stress, to enable more affordable 
access to food and clean water.
Circular economy and zero pollution
Controlling pollution of air, land and 
water to below harmful levels for 
humans and other living organisms 
and building a circular economy that 
avoids waste. 
37 Engagement (on select material ESG considerations) and voting activities are being exercised in relation to all our Private Bank DPM investment strategies globally with the exception of services managed in India. Engagement activity is 
undertaken for our direct fixed income and equity holdings, while voting activity is only undertaken for our direct equity holdings.
38 It is our intention to exercise voting in all markets, although at times our ability to do so may be hindered by regulatory and practical considerations as well as internal restrictions.
39 Please see the EOS website for further details.
40 It is our intention to exercise voting (with the exception of services managed in India), although at times our ability to do so may be hindered by regulatory and practical considerations, as well as internal restrictions.
41 Please see EOS’ 2024 Annual Review – EOS Voting and Engagement Highlights report.
42 Please see the Global Goals website for details on the UN SDGs.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
19
For climate change, EOS’s engagement 
focuses on companies having a 
strategy and GHG emissions reduction 
targets aligned, so far as possible, to 
the goals of the Paris Agreement43, 
seeking to limit global warming to 
below 2°C and pursue efforts towards 
1.5°C, and take advantage of the 
opportunities where commercially 
feasible. In seeking Paris-aligned 
transition plans, EOS evaluates the 
credibility of company transition plans, 
including their acknowledgement of 
key policy, technology and market 
dependencies. EOS also continues 
to engage with companies in high-
methane-emitting sectors to take 
action, so far as possible, to mitigate 
emissions associated with the high 
energy demand for AI-related services, 
build resilience to physical climate 
risks across relevant sectors and 
work towards a ‘just transition’ for 
employees and communities. 
Finally, EOS may also engage 
companies on developing robust 
approaches to managing exposure to 
acute and chronic physical risks, for 
example, requesting that companies 
perform quantitative scenario analysis 
and identify clear actions for managing 
and mitigating these risks. This also 
includes natural resource stewardship 
engagements, given many companies 
have dependencies on nature and 
biodiversity, which support resilience 
and adaptation to physical risk.
EOS uses different methods to escalate 
and intensify engagement with 
companies over time, depending on the 
nature of the challenges faced and the 
attitude of the board towards dialogue. 
Where Private Bank DPM believes 
engagement is not successful, it 
may look to take further escalation 
measures, such as voting 
against  management.
EOS is also an active participant in 
a number of collaborative industry 
bodies and initiatives around the 
world. Engagements through such 
collaborations are mechanisms that 
may act as a lever to encourage positive 
change. As an example, EOS continues 
to engage and encourage best practice 
standards related to stewardship via 
the Institutional Investor Group on 
Climate Change (IIGCC) and Climate 
Action 100+.
43 Please see the United Nations website for further details on the Paris Agreement.
Source: Barclays Private Bank and EOS at Federated Hermes, 2024
Raise 
concern at 
appropriate 
level
Concern 
acknowledged 
by company
Company 
commits 
to credible 
change
Change 
implemented
1
2
3
4


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
20
3.4ei - Private Bank DPM example of climate-related stewardship activity 
EOS has been engaging with a 
European specialty chemical 
company for five years. The 
company develops and produces 
systems and products that are 
used for bonding, sealing, damping, 
reinforcing and protecting in the 
building and motor vehicle sector.
Through engagement with EOS, the 
company began internally assessing 
its scope 3 emissions and seeks to 
make these publicly available where 
feasible. Previously, the company 
was reporting its scope 1 and 
scope 2 emissions only. EOS also 
encouraged the company to develop 
a transition roadmap alongside 
obtaining external validation for 
their scope 3 emissions reduction 
targets by the Science Based 
Targets initiative (SBTi) in 2024.
The company also published a 
roadmap highlighting which key 
levers will be used to reach its 
net‑zero target for its operations. 
EOS will continue to engage with 
the company on the topic of climate 
change, and the emphasis of EOS’s 
engagement remains focused on 
the company having a strategy 
and greenhouse gas emissions 
reduction targets aligned, so far as 
possible, to the goals of the Paris 
Agreement, to limit climate change 
to below 2°C and pursue efforts 
towards 1.5°C and take advantage 
of the opportunities where 
commercially feasible.
3.4eii – Private Bank DPM: 
Climate‑related votes 
Voting44 forms part of our overall 
stewardship strategy and we use 
our rights as shareholders to seek to 
encourage desired change on ESG 
and other considerations – consistent 
with our business objectives and aims 
to deliver competitive investment 
returns for our clients and to create 
long-term value for stakeholders. This 
is a contributing element in meeting our 
fiduciary duties towards our clients.
For our direct equity holdings, we use 
our rights as shareholders to seek our 
desired changes. Our equity portfolio 
managers are ultimately responsible for 
making voting decisions.
Following receipt of EOS’s voting 
recommendations, Private Bank DPM’s 
Equity portfolio managers meet to 
discuss this information for a select 
number of voting issues and decisions 
in advance of making the voting 
decision on behalf of our clients. Voting 
decisions are made by the lead portfolio 
managers based on the company’s 
ESG and investment analysis and what 
the portfolio managers assess to best 
serve our clients’ long-term interests.
Overall, Private Bank DPM’s approach 
is rooted in EOS’s Global Voting 
Guidelines45, 46, which inform voting 
recommendations to EOS clients. 
These guidelines have been informed 
by international best practice and 
local regional considerations (e.g. EOS 
Global Voting Guidelines; Regional 
voting principles; Country-level voting 
guidelines). These guidelines are 
extensive, covering a number of ESG 
topics, and have been drafted based 
on decades of experience of seeking 
change at companies.
3.4f – Private Bank DPM: 
Third‑party funds
The Funds team at Private Bank is 
responsible for maintaining a panel 
of third-party managed active funds, 
from which the Private Bank DPM 
team can select funds for inclusion in 
the Global Multi-Asset Class Strategy 
and Core Plus Fixed Income Strategy 
(which are both Traditional strategies) 
and the Multi-Asset Class Sustainable 
Total Return Strategy (a Sustainable 
strategy). Investments in third-party 
funds represent 15% of the Private 
Bank DPM AUM in scope of this report.
Further work is underway to align 
the Private Bank DPM and Wealth 
Management (BISL) approach to 
assessing ESG and climate-related 
risks. We will report on progress in next 
year’s report.  
44 It is our intention to exercise voting in all markets. However, our ability to do so may be hindered by regulatory and practical considerations, as well as internal restrictions.
45 The voting guidelines do not seek to provide an exhaustive list on all voting matters but rather set out the broad position on several key topics with global applicability. 
46 Further details are highlighted in the EOS Policy Documents and Regional Vote Guidelines, and the Barclays Private Bank Responsible Investing Policy (Discretionary Portfolio Management).


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
21
47 Based on MSCI methodology. Please see Glossary of key terms for further details.
48 Such temperature metrics are based on projections and so are indicative only, may be sensitive to change and based on estimates which may not be accurate or complete. There is no guarantee that each company has set net-zero targets or that a 
company will be able to achieve its emission reduction targets or that even if such targets are achieved, future warming or emissions levels will be as predicted.
3.5 – Private Bank DPM: Metrics and targets 
Private Bank DPM believes data and 
metrics are key to understanding and 
managing the risks of climate-related 
risks and opportunities. 
The dashboards described in section 
3.4a provide a tool for the Private 
Bank DPM investment team to 
assess its equity and fixed income 
holdings. They help Private Bank 
DPM understand a company’s 
operational quality and identify 
material risks and opportunities to 
its cashflow. Climate‑related factors 
considered include but are not limited 
to a company’s ITR47, 48 and carbon 
footprint. Private Bank DPM considers 
a company’s resource intensity, 
which comprises, but is not limited to, 
physical risk exposure, water stress, 
waste and biodiversity. These metrics 
are based on internal data sources and 
third-party data vendors, such as MSCI, 
Credit Suisse Holt and Bloomberg. 
Private Bank DPM’s ESG dashboards 
include a company’s ITR, which 
measures its temperature alignment, 
quantified in degrees Celsius (°C). The 
temperature measurement shows 
the outcome, if the whole economy 
had the same carbon budget over-/ 
undershoot level as the company to 
keeping the world’s temperature rise 
to 2°C by 2100. It provides an indication 
of how companies and investment 
portfolios align to global climate 
targets. At a portfolio level, the ITR is 
compiled on an aggregated basis for 
the portfolio companies.
The ITR for the in-scope AUM for 
Private Bank DPM is 2.1°C. The ITR is 
a weighted average of the AUM and 
includes direct holdings and third‑party 
funds. This is an increase from the 
ITR reported in last year’s report of 
1.8°C. The increase in the ITR is partly 
attributed to data quality. We observed 
that 49.2% of issuers did not have an 
ITR metric in last year’s report. For the 
current reporting period, c.6% of these 
issuers now have an ITR. In addition, 
0.2% of those issuers identified in the 
last reporting period now have an ITR of 
10°C for this reporting period – this is 
the maximum ITR MSCI will apply to an 
issuer based on its methodology. 
The assets included in the ITR 
calculation are 58% of the Private Bank 
DPM AUM in scope of this report. Last 
year, the assets included in the ITR 
calculation were 51% of AUM. Whilst 
the ITR focuses on carbon emissions 
from corporates, the majority of the 
data gap for the ITR is attributed 
to sovereigns, which MSCI does 
not include in its ITR methodology. 
Private Bank DPM is dependent on the 
methodology and capabilities of MSCI. 
Please see section 6.0 Data limitations 
for further details.
Climate-related metrics are presented 
to the PBWM Sustainability and Climate 
Change Committee for quarterly 
management oversight. Private 
Bank DPM continues to assess how 
further enhancements can be made to 
metrics used to measure and manage 
climate‑related risks and opportunities 
in the investment process. 
Against the backdrop of the shifting 
and rapidly developing geopolitical and 
regulatory landscape, Private Bank 
DPM continues to consider potential 
strategies to address climate-related 
risks and opportunities, including the 
setting of targets. We will provide an 
update in next year’s report. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
22
49 Please see the PCAF website for details.
50 Please see Glossary of key terms.
51 The asset categorisation used by MSCI is not in line with our internal approach for categorising asset classes. We have not individually identified cash, derivatives, alternative investments and structured products but estimate they total c.1%.   
3.5a – Private Bank DPM: 2024 metrics
As this is our second year of reporting, 
we have disclosed the previous year’s 
metrics for comparison purposes. The 
carbon metrics in tables 5, 6 and 7 are 
in line with the TCFD recommendations 
and the Partnership for Carbon 
Accounting Financials (PCAF) 
standards49. For carbon footprint, 
Private Bank DPM has used Enterprise 
Value Including Cash (EVIC)50 as the 
denominator in accordance with the 
PCAF standards and to cover both 
equity and debt. Data is sourced from 
MSCI as of 31 December 2024.The AUM 
in scope of this report is £14.8bn as 
of 31 December 2024. For last year’s 
report the in-scope AUM was £12.8bn.
The scope of assets covered in the 
metrics in table 5 is 63% of the AUM 
in scope of this report and includes 
direct equity and fixed income assets 
held within third-party active managed 
funds for Private Bank DPM. Sovereigns 
(28%), cash, derivatives, alternative 
investments and structured products51 
are excluded from table 5. 
Table 5 – 2024 metrics 
2024
2024 coverage
2023
2023 coverage
Total emissions 
(Metric tons of 
CO2e)
Scopes 1 & 2
307,621
60.5%
305,948
50.9%
Scope 3
2,097,726
60.1%
2,045,011
50.6%
Carbon 
footprint 
(Metric tons 
CO2e per $m 
invested)
Scopes 1 & 2
19
60.5%
19
50.9%
Scope 3
127
60.1%
125
50.6%
Weighted 
average carbon 
intensity (Metric 
tons CO2e per 
$m sales)
Scopes 1 & 2
68
60.5%
53
57.7%
MSCI changed its methodology for 
supranationals in 2024. This has 
resulted in adjustments for the 2023 
reporting period data. Supranationals 
have now been included in the 
calculations in table 5, whereas in last 
year’s TCFD report they had been 
excluded. Supranationals are 11% of 
the AUM in scope of this report.  
There is a marginal increase in total 
emissions (scopes 1, 2 and 3) and 
weighted average carbon intensity 
(WACI) metrics for the reporting period 
– see table 5. This is driven mainly by 
an increase in the AUM of high carbon 
emitting sectors in the reporting 
period. A change in the portfolio 
composition for the AUM in scope of 
this report has contributed to non-
material changes to the footprint for 
scopes 1, 2 and 3. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
23
Table 6 – Sector metrics
Total emissions (Metric tons of CO2e)
Carbon footprint 
(Metric tons CO2e per $m invested)
Weighted average 
carbon intensity 
(Metric tons CO2e per 
$m sales)
Scopes 1 & 2
Scope 3
Scopes 1 & 2
Scope 3
Scopes 1 & 2
Sector (% of AUM in 
scope for 2024) 
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
Information 
Technology (15%)
9,701
8,990
113,988
95,541
4
4
41
44
30
25
Funds excl ETFs (11%)
77,256
35,188
453,410
228,554
37
38
214
245
86
94
Financials (7%)
13,682
24,182
77,016
84,951
10
13
57
47
28
33
Communication (5%)
4,049
7,481
26,322
76,540
4
6
27
63
14
20
Healthcare (5%)
4,012
2,535
60,903
54,656
4
3
65
67
16
14
Industrials (5%)
28,273
16,423
179,522
108,107
32
28
203
185
170
98
Consumer 
Discretionary (5%)
7,718
2,314
142,086
66,897
9
9
169
266
29
33
ETFs (4%)
39,160
7,614
211,736
56,277
60
34
322
253
156
97
Materials (2%)
29,687
28,831
93,914
148,955
107
85
338
440
527
404
Consumer Staples (1%)
2,100
3,488
33,763
49,027
8
7
130
98
20
26
Utilities (1%)
12,460
11,652
57,676
66,739
120
91
556
519
354
153
Energy (0.2%)
8,324
9,823
108,598
137,106
186
209
2,432
2,910
223
226


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
24
52 As the coverage for each sector varies, a weighted average based on the sector AUM has been calculated. 
53 MSCI incorrectly classified GICS sector and GICS Sector Code information for certain issuers prior to November 2024. 
54 MSCI has changed its methodology from the previous reporting period. Subsidiaries are now classified in the same sector as the parent company, whereas previously they were separately categorised. 
55 Table 7 shows 96% of the total sovereign exposure.
56 In scope of this report.
The scope of assets covered in table 
6 is 54%52 of Private Bank DPM AUM 
in scope of this report. It excludes 
sovereigns (28%) supranationals (11%) 
and cash, derivatives, alternative 
investments and structured products53. 
Due to a methodology change from 
MSCI in 2024, we have recalculated the 
metrics for the financial sector  for the 
2023 reporting period. The correction 
has resulted in ETFs being removed 
from the financial sector, where they 
had been previously included in the 
data reported for 2023. In addition, 
MSCI has a change in methodology 
for classification of subsidiary 
companies54. The impact of these 
changes is a reduction in all the carbon 
metrics in table 6 for the financial 
sector compared to the previous year. 
The increase in the total emissions for 
the funds, consumer discretionary, 
consumer staples sectors and 
ETFs were due to an increase in 
holdings in these sectors during the 
reporting period. 
Currently, third-party data vendors 
are unable to provide data at a granular 
level i.e. sectoral data for the underlying 
companies in third-party funds. This is 
due to the complexity and scale of data 
involved in obtaining the granularity 
required to calculate the underlying 
company sectors. We continue to 
assess how this data gap could be 
addressed, recognising that we are 
dependent on third‑party data vendors 
and their progression to provide data 
for the underlying companies. 
As we continue to evolve our 
understanding, Private Bank DPM 
has disclosed its sovereign exposure 
in table 7, which represents 28% of 
the AUM in scope of this report. Total 
sovereign emissions intensity is 152 
metric tons of CO2e / $m GDP nominal 
for the AUM in scope of this report.
Table 7 – Sovereign emissions intensity55  
% of total sovereign AUM56 
Emissions Intensity
(Metric tons of CO2e / $m 
GDP nominal)
UK
61%
124
USA
22%
234
France
6%
139
Germany
5%
167
Netherlands
2%
152
Whilst we have included metrics for 
sovereigns, some of the limitations 
PCAF has identified for sovereigns 
include i) the difficulty in accurately 
allocating emissions along the supply 
value chains, ii) the involvement of input 
output models that can vary depending 
on the third-party data vendors and iii) 
the time lag in data availability.
Private Bank DPM continues to 
expand its understanding of external 
calculation methodologies to 
determine the best approach to take. 
Derivatives, alternative investments 
and structured products are not 
currently included in the scope of 
these metrics, as external calculation 
methodologies have not been 
developed for these asset classes. 
Private Bank DPM is reliant on market 
and industry developments to guide 
its metrics and will continue reviewing 
and monitoring developments on 
how best to incorporate asset classes 
currently not included. Private 
Bank DPM will continue engaging 
with third-party data vendors such 
as MSCI to understand how their 
methodologies evolve and provide 
input where appropriate.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays 
Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
25
4.0 - Barclays Investment Managers (BIM) 
4.1 ‑ BIM: Governance
The BIM business is responsible for 
setting and ensuring the effective 
execution of BIM’s business strategy, 
inclusive of BIM’s approach to ESG, 
and leverages Barclays policies, 
standards and procedures (PSP) as 
applicable to consider various Principal 
Risks, including Climate Risk, as part 
of the investment process across its 
funds and mandates. Senior business 
accountability for BIM adhering to 
Barclays PSP resides with the Global 
Head of BIM, with oversight achieved 
through the applicable governance 
framework and through supervisory 
responsibility for BIM. The Global Head 
of BIM in turn reports into the Head of 
Cross Markets, a member of the Global 
Markets Management Team (GMMT).
At the BIM level, the BIM Control Forum 
(BIM CF) is the control oversight body. It 
is chaired by the Global Head of BIM and 
includes representation across senior 
members of the business, as well as 
business support functions including 
but not limited to Legal, Compliance 
and Risk.
The BIM CF’s mandate covers all 
areas of the business’s control 
environment in the product lifecycle, 
including all Principal Risks under the 
Barclays Enterprise Risk Management 
Framework (ERMF) including Climate 
Risk. Whilst climate-related risks 
and opportunities are not a standing 
agenda item, any escalation items 
impacting the control environment 
would be relevant to the scope of the 
BIM CF. Due to the relative position 
of the business within the larger 
organisation, BIM is also subject to the 
wider Barclays governance ecosystem 
as applicable to BIM. This is reflected 
in the reporting structure of the BIM 
governance forums, which all escalate 
and feed information into senior Global 
Markets oversight forums.
For risk and controls, the BIM CF 
escalates to the Markets Escalation 
Controls Committee (MECC), which 
is the equivalent risk and controls 
forum that oversees all businesses 
within the Global Markets division (of 
which BIM is a sub-business unit). The 
MECC subsequently reports to the 
BBPLC Control Committee; this has 
multiple reporting lines into Group-
level risk and control committees 
to ensure timely and consistent 
reporting of business‑specific and 
thematic climate-related risks to 
senior management.
For product governance and 
transaction approvals, the BIM Fund 
Review Panel (FRP) is comprised of 
senior business individuals, as well as 
representation from Legal, Compliance 
and Risk, and receives delegated 
authority from the Global Markets 
Product Governance Oversight Forum 
(PGOF). The FRP also refers certain 
proposals with ESG considerations 
to the Markets ESG Review Forum 
(MERF). MERF also acts as a point of 
escalation for material issues and 
matters relevant to the Markets 
ESG Framework, including having 
oversight of the control environment 
related to ESG within Markets. For 
funds or mandates with a particular 
sustainability nexus (including climate), 
considerations in the investment 
process and the representation of 
these characteristics are assessed 
prior to product launch by the 
transaction approval forum (which may 
be business‑specific, such as FRP, or 
division-wide, such as MERF) to validate 
the characteristics and determine 
ongoing oversight requirements.
BIM operates additional business-
specific governance which underpins 
the information presented to the 
BIM CF, such as the BIM Funds & 
Mandates Meeting (BIM F&M). The BIM 
F&M oversees the implementation 
of a number of factors, including 
proxy voting, engagement and ESG 
integration across relevant funds and 
mandates that the desk manages. 
Ongoing oversight is carried out 
at a BIM business level by BIM F&M 
with core members of the BIM team, 
alongside key control partners in 
Legal, Compliance and Risk to ensure 
independent check and challenge. 
Adherence to mandate rules in respect 
of ESG integration is therefore a 
standing agenda point at the BIM F&M.   


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays 
Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
26
4.2 – BIM: Strategy
BIM offers investment products which 
operate with limited discretion. These 
include implementation of rules-based 
methodologies, index replication, 
or delivery of portfolios with limited 
discretion in portfolio construction 
within pre‑defined investment 
guidelines. BIM’s approach to ESG, 
including the impact of climate change, 
is informed by its business model 
and the types of funds and mandates 
that it manages. In 2024, BIM updated 
its Approach to ESG statement57 to 
explain how, where possible within the 
investment guidelines of each fund, 
it seeks to use the different levers at 
its disposal to integrate consideration 
of ESG across its activities. As a 
sub‑business unit within Cross 
Markets, climate-related risks and 
opportunities are not as a matter of 
course analysed at the level of BIM’s 
business activities by BIM. However, 
BIM’s activities are included in the 
items considered within the wider 
climate‑related risks and opportunities 
for the Investment Bank. 
Climate scenario analysis is not 
conducted across the BIM product 
range as it would not be used in 
investment decision-making given the 
nature of the products. BIM will assess 
this position in line with its business 
strategy and as client and regulatory 
requirements continue to evolve.
 
4.2a – BIM: ESG integration 
in products
For ESG products, BIM integrates ESG 
characteristics, including climate, by 
using specific screens, exclusions and 
best-in-class selection. For instance, 
it excludes companies that fail to 
comply with the United Nations Global 
Compact (UNGC) Principles58 or those 
which derive a certain threshold of 
revenues related to thermal coal.
For non-ESG products which pursue 
synthetic replication of an index or 
strategy, BIM may, where the mandate 
allows, account for sustainability 
risks and integrate consideration of 
ESG factors, including climate, within 
the cash management portfolio by 
allocating into instruments which 
achieve a better overall ESG risk 
score for the portfolio. For physically 
replicated equity funds and where 
the mandate allows, BIM engages 
and exercises voting rights relating 
to investee companies. It does this 
in collaboration with the stewardship 
services provider, EOS at Federated 
Hermes. This represents 49% of the 
assets in scope of this report for BIM.
4.3 – BIM: Investment 
risk oversight
BIM uses data from third-party 
providers to monitor the integration 
of sustainability and climate-related 
considerations in relevant portfolios 
based on the mandate rules and 
underlying investments. Where 
mandates include ESG considerations 
in the investment management 
process, controls are agreed as 
to how the risks will be monitored 
and managed.
These controls include systematically 
applied screens that exclude 
investments that have particular 
characteristics, such as a cap on the 
proportion of revenue generated from 
certain activities that are not aligned 
with the fund’s stated ESG-related 
goals. Portfolios are monitored against 
these pre-established controls with 
regular reporting to the appropriate 
business governance, which provides 
oversight that actions are taken as 
necessary to bring the portfolio back 
within the fund investment guidelines.
4.4 – BIM: Metrics and targets
As referenced earlier, BIM has access 
to a range of ESG metrics, including 
related to climate, for funds which 
integrate ESG considerations in their 
investment mandate. These include: 
ESG risk score at sector and fund 
level; exposure to certain products or 
sectors; carbon footprint and carbon 
intensity; and compliance with UNGC 
Principles. These are reviewed in the 
appropriate business forum, including 
the BIM Funds & Mandates Forum. 
Although reports are prepared on a 
bespoke basis for clients on certain 
ESG metrics (including climate) for 
funds with investments in physical 
assets, BIM does not currently monitor 
climate risk at product level because 
such monitoring would not inform its 
investment decision-making for the 
products, given their limited discretion 
and/or the asset classes represented 
(such as derivatives-based products). 
For this reason, targets to manage 
climate-related risks and opportunities 
have not been set for BIM. BIM has 
not assessed the alignment of its 
products and investment strategies 
under management with a well below 
2°C scenario as it is not used by 
BIM in determining its strategy or 
risk management. This position will 
continue to be assessed in line with 
evolving business strategy, client needs 
and regulatory requirements.
57 This document is provided on request to clients and prospects.
58 Please see Glossary of key terms.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays 
Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
27
4.4a – BIM: 2024 metrics
The scope of assets covered in the 
metrics for BIM is approximately 
49% of relevant AUM. Sovereigns, 
supranationals, agency and municipal 
bonds, cash and derivatives are 
excluded. Whilst there are some 
external calculation methodologies 
and limited data available for some 
of these, BIM believes they require 
further development to be appropriate 
for inclusion in the metrics reported. 
BIM is reliant on market and industry 
developments to guide its metrics and 
will continue reviewing and monitoring 
developments how best to incorporate 
asset types currently not included.
Table 8 – 2024 metrics
2024
2024 coverage
2023
2023 Coverage
Total emissions 
(Metric tons 
of CO2e)
Scopes 1 & 2
87,843
48.6%
62,420
47.6%
Scope 3
487,019
48.6%
347,100
47.2%
Carbon 
footprint 
(Metric tons 
CO2e per 
€m invested)
Scopes 1 & 2
57
48.6%
46
47.6%
Scope 3
315
48.6%
254
47.2%
Weighted 
average carbon 
intensity (Metric 
tons CO2e per 
€m sales)
Scopes 1 & 2
104
48.5%
111
47.6%


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays 
Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
28
Table 9 – Sector metrics 
Total emissions (Metric tons of CO2e)
Carbon footprint 
(Metric tons CO2e per €m invested)
Weighted average 
carbon intensity 
(Metric tons CO2e per 
€m sales)
Scopes 1 & 2
Scope 3
Scopes 1 & 2
Scope 3
Scopes 1 & 2
Sector (% of AUM in 
scope for 2024) 
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
Information Technology 
(42.3%)
15,666
22,719
86,629
103,251
24
42
132
193
90
109
Financials (24.2%)
736
1,313
126,713
50,404
2
4
339
146
7
15
Consumer 
Discretionary (9.3%)
5,052
4,353
172,160
134,583
35
27
1,194
842
35
33
Consumer Staples 
(8.2%)
4,570
1,273
32,039
5,1534
36
23
253
92
52
37
Materials (4.9%)
52,439
11,105
39,814
23,154
700
178
531
372
858
516
Industrials (4.6%)
7,765
12,711
25,949
23,572
109
179
364
333
243
271
Telecommunication 
Services (4.4%)
1,420
3,547
2,894
5,614
21
41
42
65
47
70
Real Estate (1.8%)
175
154
814
858
6
7
29
40
81
93
Healthcare (0.3%)
19
27
7
12
4
4
2
2
9
19
Utilities (0%)
0
5,219
0
500
0
241
0
23
0
971


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
29
5.0 – Calculation methodology59 
This section outlines the calculations used for this report, as well as the pros and cons of them. Metrics for Private Bank DPM and BIM have not been aggregated for 
this report as each business line operates independently and differently to each other. Table 10 shows the calculation methodology used for the metrics in the relevant 
Private Bank DPM and BIM sections.
Table 10
Description
Calculation 
Pros
Cons
Total 
emissions
This measures the total 
emissions attributed of 
a portfolio.  
•	 As an absolute metric and it 
is easier to interpret. 
•	 Metric can be used to track 
changes in GHG emissions 
in a portfolio. 
•	 Cannot do a relative 
comparison of the company 
within its sector.
•	 Is subject to 
market volatility.  
Carbon 
footprint
This measures the carbon 
emissions of an investment 
taking into account the portion 
of ownership. For a portfolio, 
it is the total emissions of the 
portfolio normalised by the 
market value of the portfolio. 
•	 A relative metric that can be 
used to compare companies 
across sectors.
•	 It allows for portfolio 
decomposition and 
attribution analysis.
•	 Changes in underlying 
companies’ market 
capitalisation can 
be misinterpreted.
Revenue 
Intensity
This measures a portfolio’s 
exposure to carbon-intensive 
companies, defined as the 
portfolio weighted average of 
companies’ carbon intensity.
•	 It can be easily applied 
across asset classes since 
it does not rely on equity 
ownership approach.
•	 The calculation of this 
metric is fairly simple and 
easy to communicate 
to investors. 
•	 The metric is sensitive 
to outliers.
•	 Using revenue (instead of 
physical or other metrics) 
to normalise the data tends 
to favour companies with 
higher pricing levels relative 
to their peers.
Sovereign 
intensity
This measures exposure to 
carbon-intensive economies, 
defined as the portfolio 
weighted average of 
sovereigns’ GHG intensity.
•	 A relative metric that can be 
used to compare nations.
•	 There is an inherent 
complexity to calculating 
the emissions profile 
of multi-faceted 
sovereign nations.
∑ (Current value of investment X                                                                         )
Current portfolio value
Issuer’s GHG emissions
Issuer’s revenue¡
tCO2e/$m revenue = 
∑i (Current value of investmenti X                                                                         )
Current portfolio value
n
Sovereign issuer’s 
GHG emissions
Sovereign issuer’s $m GDP¡
∑(Current value of investment X Issuer’s GHG emissions)
Issuer’s EVIC
Current porfolio value
tCO2e/$m invested = 
∑(Current value of investment X Issuer’s GHG emissions)
Issuer’s EVIC
MtCO2e = 
59 EVIC is the Enterprise Value Including Cash – please see Glossary of key terms. Total emissions and carbon footprint metrics for Private Bank DPM and BIM are in line with Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF Standard). Whilst the 
calculation for the weighted average carbon intensity in table 10 is based in US dollars, BIM’s metric is based in Euros. Private Bank DPM has calculated this metric in US dollars, as per the table.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
30
6.0 – Data limitations
In creating this report, we have used 
ESG and climate data from third-
party data vendors that we consider 
appropriate and suitable for these 
purposes, as at the date on which 
they were deployed. However, there is 
currently no universally accepted way 
of reporting, rating or categorising ESG 
data and so, where we rely on third-
party data, such data may be subject to 
certain limitations. These limitations 
can be categorised as follows:
Quality
The ESG and climate data we use is commonly based on estimations that are the output of our third-party data vendors’ 
estimation methodologies, one example of this being the scope 3 GHG emissions of portfolio companies. Furthermore, 
ESG data may not be audited or otherwise reviewed by an independent third party. While we will use sources that we 
believe to be reliable, we do not guarantee the information is accurate, complete, and up to date. Our reliance on these 
estimation methodologies means that the calculated metrics can only be interpreted to be approximate and not precise. 
Transparency
We can have limited visibility on the exact details behind an estimated data point from third-party data providers. This 
prevents us from having full transparency of the estimated ESG and climate data points in our calculations. 
Timeliness 
We source ESG and climate data from public reports for our portfolio companies, which are commonly produced on a 
quarterly or annual cycle. Consequently, the ESG and climate data reported against our portfolio companies maybe out 
of sync as at the end of the TCFD reporting period. 
Coverage 
The levels of disclosure of ESG and climate data can be low from certain holdings, such as supranationals. 
Private Bank DPM and BIM continue to monitor the quality of data, external models and methodologies. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
31
7.0 – Principal Investments 
7.1 – PI: Introduction
Principal Investments (PI) is a team 
within Group Treasury that manages 
Barclays’ minority equity investments 
and, where applicable, any associated 
co-investments. The co-investment 
portfolio for which BBPLC acts 
as the investment manager is the 
only role and sub-portfolio within 
PI that is in-scope for this TCFD 
report. The co-investment portfolio 
that is managed by BBPLC was 
launched in 2007 focusing on private 
equity opportunities in the natural 
resources sector.
Since 2015, the co-investment 
portfolio has been a closed structure, 
with no new portfolio companies and no 
new investors. This report covers the 
reference period 1 January 2024 – 31 
December 2024, at the end of which the 
AUM was approximately £273m. 
7.2 – PI: Governance
ESG is part of the consideration that 
the PI Equity Committee (the Equity 
Committee) takes into account when 
evaluating investment opportunities 
and exits. PI’s focus is on investing in a 
responsible way, integrating relevant 
ESG risks and opportunities throughout 
the whole investment process, from 
pre-investment due diligence, through 
each investment’s life and to ultimate 
exit. PI believes that ESG and climate 
change matters present both risks 
and opportunities within the wider 
co‑investment portfolio. 
The Equity Committee undertakes the 
senior approval responsibilities relating 
to the execution and management of all 
principal strategic equity and workout 
equity transactions managed on behalf 
of Barclays and all Group entities. The 
co-investment portfolio is included 
in the remit of matters for the Equity 
Committee to consider, with the ability 
to veto a proposed investment or asset 
purchase recommended by BBPLC (in 
its capacity as investment manager) 
or the right to require BBPLC (in its 
capacity as investment manager) to 
reconsider a recommendation by it to 
sell, to not invest or to not purchase 
an asset. 
The formation and authority of the 
Equity Committee comes from 
the Group CEO acting through the 
Group Executive Committee. The 
voters on the Equity Committee are 
comprised of senior representatives 
of the PI business and the PI risk 
management department.
As part of a transaction review, the 
Equity Committee considers climate 
and sustainability matters, inviting 
specialist coverage teams to the 
committee meeting where necessary. 
The Equity Committee in its role of 
considering any recommendation from 
BBPLC in relation to the co-investment 
portfolio may ultimately decide to 
exercise its veto or invite BBPLC 
to reconsider a recommendation, 
as described above based on ESG 
considerations (a subset of which is 
climate risk).
7.3 - PI: Strategy
Climate-related issues could manifest 
through impact to investment 
valuations, ability to find a suitable 
purchaser and could result in stranded 
assets. The total book size of the 
co-investment portfolio as of 31 
December 2024 is approximately 
£273m which, taking the conservative 
assumption of full write-down, would 
be low materiality based on the Risk 
Register (which contains identified risks 
by legal entity and risk type).
Investments are valued semi-annually, 
and any climate-related risks are 
considered within the assessment of 
the valuation. The remaining operating 
investments are across natural 
resources-related sectors and are 
geographically diverse. This means that 
there are a number of climate-related 
risks across the portfolio which can be 
both physical and transitional in nature.
The co-investment portfolio is at a 
mature stage, with focus on divestment 
opportunities over the medium term. 
Climate-related impacts (e.g. to 
investment valuation, ability to find 
a suitable purchaser, risk of stranded 
assets) are expected to be limited 
given the long-term manifestation of 
climate risk and will reduce through 
time as exits are completed. Risks 
and opportunities associated with 
sustainability (a subset of which 
includes climate) are assessed on a 
qualitative basis both as part of ongoing 
monitoring and when transactions are 
referred to the Equity Committee.
7.4 – PI: Risk management
Given the sectors in which the portfolio 
companies (comprised in the AUM 
of the co-investment portfolio) 
operate, a wide range of climate 
events could have a significant impact 
on the valuation of the investment 
(e.g. physical risks such as damage to 
infrastructure, production facilities 
or product storage, or transition 
risks such as policy changes delaying 
project milestones).
Most of the portfolio companies in 
the PI co-investment portfolio are 
asset- heavy and capital-intensive 
businesses and rely significantly on 
physical infrastructure and equipment. 
More frequent droughts and floods 
can alter the supply of water to sites, 
damage infrastructure and equipment 
and disrupt production and operations, 
requiring downtime whilst repairs take 
place, as well as reduced production 
capacity due to disrupted energy 
supply, extreme temperatures or 
limitations to water availability.
Extreme heat can decrease worker 
productivity and result in equipment 
overheating and raise cooling costs. 
However, the risk is expected to have 
limited impact on the value of the 
portfolio given the overall divestment 
strategy and that climate-related 
issues often manifest over a longer 
time period but noting asset‑specific 
scenario analysis to verify this has not 
been completed.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
32
During 2024, climate-risk drivers were 
incorporated within the internal stress 
test scenario for the first time rather 
than being considered as a stand‑alone 
exercise or as an addition to the internal 
stress test. Despite posing risks to 
some companies, climate‑related 
issues also present economic 
opportunities for some of the portfolio 
companies as their products play an 
important role in the shift towards a 
low‑carbon economy.
PI has board representation at 
each of co-investment portfolio 
companies and as part of day-to-day 
portfolio management, ESG risks and 
opportunities (a subset of which is 
climate) are considered and reported 
on a continuous basis and discussed at 
board meetings. PI works with portfolio 
companies, in conjunction with external 
sector specialist advisers, appointed by 
BBPLC to support in driving operational 
and strategic improvements, including 
identifying and managing matters, 
such as operational health & safety and 
community engagement, and other 
environmental matters that may be 
significant for their corporate strategy.
An assessment is made by portfolio 
managers in conjunction with advisers 
and the portfolio company board 
on the materiality of the risk and, 
if deemed material, a board level 
plan is implemented to address the 
risk. Where necessary, the portfolio 
manager will discuss with internal 
sustainability-focused colleagues 
and in conjunction with the PI 
risk management department. If 
appropriate, matters are escalated 
to the Equity Committee, where 
specialist teams are invited to attend 
to share perspectives. Through the 
board role, PI can seek to influence an 
accelerated exit strategy should the 
ESG risks (a subset of which is climate) 
be considered heightened. 
At a portfolio level (a subset of which 
is the co-investment portfolio), 
the risk management department 
carries out climate monitoring 
and reporting activities to senior 
management stakeholders.
7.5 - PI: Metrics and targets
PI makes qualitative assessments 
based on relevant portfolio company 
reporting and overall sector knowledge. 
This is factored into the investment 
life cycle with the Equity Committee 
considering such factors formally.
No specific climate metrics are 
calculated to assess climate-related 
risks or opportunities on the portfolio 
companies. Although, over the past 
year, a number of portfolio companies 
made several improvements in tracking 
carbon emissions, energy use and 
water consumption more closely. 
Some have also set GHG reduction 
targets, which reflects their dedication 
to decarbonisation. Investments are 
monitored monthly by PI Risk Team 
and quarterly within the Treasury and 
Capital Risk Committee. Investments 
are revalued semi‑annually and any 
specific climate‑ related risks or events 
are considered, where relevant.
Given the closed nature and mature 
status of the co-investment portfolio, 
no GHG emissions targets are set for 
the portfolio as a whole or for individual 
portfolio companies. There are also 
no GHG emissions calculations for the 
portfolio. On an individual portfolio 
company level, the companies are 
not currently required to report GHG 
emissions and measurable reduction 
targets, although some of the portfolio 
companies have started to set GHG 
emission reduction targets and monitor 
their emissions. As a result, PI cannot 
currently disclose the GHG emissions 
for the portfolio.
Some portfolio companies operate 
in the emerging markets where 
local legislative standards are not 
as developed, or laws are poorly 
enforced and thus do not typically 
report sophisticated measurable 
metrics. They do not have advanced 
methodologies and do not currently 
engage external consultants where 
internal capability gaps exist. The 
portfolio companies typically have 
limited financial resources and focus 
efforts on qualitative ESG reporting (a 
subset of which is climate) for the board 
and shareholders.
Certain portfolio companies are 
focused on developing plans to reduce 
carbon emissions from their operations 
and supply chains wherever possible, 
as documented in their respective 
policy statements. Via the board 
role, PI has the ability to influence the 
development and implementation 
of robust sustainability and climate 
strategy that aligns to Paris Agreement 
pledge to try to prevent temperatures 
rising above 2°C above pre-industrial 
levels and integration of climate 
considerations into business plans and 
risk management processes. However, 
PI does not measure the alignment with 
a 2°C scenario. PI does not perform 
climate-related scenario analysis, but 
qualitative ESG matters are taken into 
account by the Equity Committee 
when considering investments 
and divestments.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
33
8.0 – Glossary of key terms
Adaptation: The process of 
adjustment to actual or expected 
climate and its effects. In human 
systems, adaptation seeks 
to moderate or avoid harm or 
exploit beneficial opportunities. 
In some natural systems, human 
intervention may facilitate 
adjustment to expected climate and 
its effects (IPCC 2022). 
Assets under management (AUM): 
The AUM represents the aggregate 
value of client assets managed, 
advised or otherwise contracted, 
from which the Group, including 
joint ventures and associates, earns 
operating revenue. 
Climate tipping point: Please see 
Tipping point below. 
Disorderly 1.5°C scenario: A 
disorderly transition scenario 
assumes climate policies are 
delayed or divergent, requiring 
sharper emissions reductions which 
is achieved at a higher cost. There 
are increased physical risks in order 
to limit temperature rise to below 
2°C on pre-industrial averages.
Enterprise value including cash 
(EVIC): The sum of the market 
capitalisation of ordinary shares 
at fiscal year end, the market 
capitalisation of preferred shares 
at fiscal year end, and the book 
values of total debt and minorities’ 
interests. No deductions of cash 
or cash equivalents are made to 
avoid the possibility of negative 
enterprise values. Based on the 
PCAF definition.
Environmental, social and 
governance (ESG) integration: The 
systematic inclusion of financially 
material ESG factors in investment 
analysis and investment decisions, 
with the goal of enhancing 
long‑term, risk-adjusted financial 
returns. Examples include but are 
not limited to: Environmental – 
Factors that relate to the quality 
and functioning of the natural 
environment, and natural systems. 
These include carbon emissions, 
environmental regulations, 
water stress and waste. Social – 
Factors that relate to the rights, 
well‑being, and interests of people 
and communities, such as labour 
management and health & safety. 
Governance – Factors that relate to 
the management and oversight of 
companies and investee entities, 
including board structure and pay. 
Exchange-traded fund (ETF): A 
type of pooled investment security 
that can be bought and sold like an 
individual stock.
Feedback loop: Feedback loops 
are a series of events which are 
triggered by an initial change. 
Positive feedback loops are 
feedback loops which amplify 
the initial change and lead to a 
repetition of the cycle. An example 
of a positive feedback loop could be 
an initial cooling of the earth. 
Fragmented world: The 
Fragmented World scenario 
assumes delayed and divergent 
climate policy ambition globally, 
leading to high physical and 
transition risks. Countries with 
net zero targets achieve these 
only partially (80% of the target), 
while the other countries follow 
current policies. 
Fund: A fund is a collective 
investment, where investors’ 
money is pooled together and 
spread across a wide range of 
underlying investments, to help the 
spread of overall risk.
Greenhouse gas emissions 
(GHG): GHG are gases in the 
Earth’s atmosphere that trap 
heat. The main ones are carbon 
dioxide, methane, nitrous 
oxide hydrofluorocarbons, 
perfluorocarbons and sulphur 
hexafluoride. GHG emissions from 
human activities intensify the 
greenhouse effect, contributing 
to climate change. Carbon dioxide, 
from burning fossil fuels such as 
coal, oil, and natural gas, is one 
of the most important factors in 
causing climate change. For further 
details, please see the European 
Environmental Agency.
Hothouse world 3°C scenario: The 
hothouse world scenario assumes 
only currently implemented 
policies are preserved. Current 
commitments are not met and 
emissions continue to rise, with high 
physical risks and severe social and 
economic disruption and a failure to 
limit temperature rise.
Implied temperature rise (ITR): 
Based on MSCI methodology. The 
calculation uses an aggregated 
budget approach that compares 
the sum of financed projected 
carbon emissions against the 
sum of financed carbon emission 
budgets for underlying portfolio 
holdings. A company projected to 
emit carbon below budget can be 
said to “undershoot” the budget. 
A company projected to exceed 
the budget “overshoots” it. This 
calculation provides an estimation 
of the total carbon budget under-/
overshoot of the portfolio. The total 
portfolio carbon emission over/
undershoot is then converted to a 
degree of temperature rise.
Intergovernmental Panel on 
Climate Change (IPCC): Created in 
1988 by the World Meteorological 
Organization (WMO) and the United 
Nations Environment Programme 
(UNEP), the objective of the IPCC is 
to provide governments at all levels 
with scientific information that they 
can use to develop climate policies. 


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
34
Mitigation (of climate change): A 
human intervention to reduce the 
sources or enhance the sinks of 
greenhouse gases (IPCC 2022). 
Nationally determined contributions 
(NDCs): NDCs includes all pledged 
policies even if not yet backed up 
by implemented effective policies. 
This scenario assumes moderate 
and heterogenous climate ambition 
reflected in the conditional NDCs at 
the beginning of 2024 continues over 
the 21st century (low transition risks). 
Emissions decline but lead nonetheless 
to 2.3°C of warming associated with 
moderate to severe physical risks. 
Transition risks are relatively low. 
Net zero: Refers to the balance 
between the amount of greenhouse gas 
(GHG) that’s produced and the amount 
that’s removed from the atmosphere. It 
can be achieved through a combination 
of emission reduction and emission 
removal. (Net Zero Climate). 
Orderly below 2°C scenario: An 
orderly transition scenario assumes 
climate policies are introduced early 
and become gradually more stringent. 
Global net-zero CO2 emissions are 
achieved around 2050, and it is likely 
that global warming will be limited to 
below 2°C on pre-industrial averages. 
Principal Adverse Impact Indicators 
(PAIs): Under the EU Sustainable 
Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), 
financial market participants are 
required to consider the principal 
adverse impacts of investment 
decisions on sustainability. The PAIs 
are a set of mandatory indicators and 
metrics which aim to show financial 
market participants how certain 
investments pose sustainability risks.
Residual risk: The risk related to 
climate change impacts that remains 
following adaptation and mitigation 
efforts. Adaptation actions can 
redistribute risk and impacts, with 
increased risk and impacts in some 
areas or populations, and decreased 
risk and impacts in others (IPCC 2022).
Scenario: A scenario describes a path 
of development leading to a particular 
outcome. Scenarios are not intended 
to represent a full description of the 
future, but rather to highlight central 
elements of a possible future and to 
draw attention to the key factors that 
will drive future developments. 
Scope 1 emissions: Direct GHG 
emissions from sources that are 
owned or controlled by a company 
(Carbon Trust). 
Scope 2 emissions: Indirect GHG 
emissions from the generation of 
purchased or acquired electricity, 
steam, heat or cooling consumed by a 
company (Carbon Trust). 
Scope 3 emissions: Covers all other 
indirect GHG emissions not included 
in scope 2 emissions that occur in the 
upstream and downstream activities of 
an organisation (Carbon Trust).
Sustainable Finance Disclosure 
Regulation (SFDR): SFDR is a European 
disclosure regime whereby asset 
managers are responsible for assigning 
a particular classification to their 
product and making certain disclosures 
accordingly. There is no guarantee 
that the classification assigned by an 
asset manager to a product is correct. 
Financial products can be classified 
as 1) products that have an intended 
sustainability target, such as reduction 
of CO2 emissions (Article 9 products), 2) 
products that promote environmental 
or social characteristics (Article 8 
products) or 3) other products without 
specific sustainability considerations. 
Taskforce on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures (TCFD): The 
Financial Stability Board created the 
TCFD to develop recommendations 
on the types of information that 
companies should disclose to support 
investors, lenders and insurance 
underwriters in appropriately assessing 
and pricing a specific set of risks – risks 
related to climate change. 
Tipping point: A tipping point is a 
critical threshold that, when crossed, 
leads to large, accelerating and often 
irreversible changes in the climate 
system. If tipping points are crossed, 
they are likely to have severe impacts 
on human society and may accelerate 
global warming. Please see the 
Nature article ‘Exceeding 1.5°C global 
warming could trigger multiple climate 
tipping points’ for further details on 
tipping points.
United Nations Global Compact 
(UNGC): A voluntary initiative based 
on CEO commitments to implement 
universal sustainable principles and 
to take steps to support UN goals (UN 
Global Compact).


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
35
9.0 – Disclaimers
Information provided in 
climate disclosures and 
sustainability‑related content:  
What is important to our clients 
and stakeholders evolves over 
time, and we aim to anticipate and 
respond to these changes. Disclosure 
expectations in relation to climate 
change and sustainability matters are 
particularly fast moving and differ from 
more traditional areas of reporting 
including in relation to the level of 
detail and forward-looking nature 
of the information involved and the 
consideration of impacts on people 
and the planet. We have adapted our 
approach in relation to the disclosure of 
such matters.
Our climate disclosures and 
sustainability-related content take 
into account the wider context 
relevant to these topics, which may 
include evolving stakeholder views, 
the development of our climate 
strategy, longer timeframes for 
assessing potential risks and impacts, 
international long-term climate 
and nature-based policy goals and 
evolving sustainability-related policy 
frameworks (and the harmonisation or 
interoperability of relevant regulation) 
and geopolitical developments and 
regional variations.
Our climate disclosures and 
sustainability-related content are 
subject to more uncertainty than 
disclosures relating to other subjects, 
given market challenges in relation 
to data reliability, consistency and 
timeliness – the use of estimates, 
judgements and assumptions which 
are likely to change over time, the 
application and development of data, 
models, scenarios and methodologies, 
the change in regulatory landscape, and 
variations in reporting standards.
These factors mean disclosures may 
be amended, updated, and recalculated 
in future as market practice and data 
quality and availability develops, and 
could cause actual achievements, 
results, performance or other future 
events or conditions to differ, in 
some cases materially, from those 
stated, implied and/or reflected in any 
forward-looking statements or metrics 
included in our climate disclosures and 
sustainability-related content.
We give no assurance as to the 
likelihood of the achievement or 
reasonableness of any projections, 
estimates, forecasts, targets, 
commitments, ambitions, prospects 
or returns contained in our climate 
disclosures and sustainability-related 
content and make no commitment to 
revise or update any such disclosures 
to reflect events or circumstances 
occurring or existing after the date of 
such statements.
ESG data: 
There is currently no universally 
accepted way of reporting, rating or 
categorising ESG data and so, where 
we may refer to, or rely on, third-
party data, such data may be subject 
to certain limitations (including in 
relation to the quality, timeliness, 
completeness and availability of such 
ESG data). Importantly, ESG data may 
not be audited or otherwise reviewed 
by an independent third party and while 
Barclays will use sources it believes to 
be reliable, we do not guarantee the 
information is accurate, complete, 
and up to date. The models and 
methodologies underlying, and any 
judgements, estimates or assumptions 
made in determining, ESG data and 
metrics are rapidly evolving.  This may 
directly or indirectly affect any ESG 
data or metrics contained in this report.
ESG definitions: 
Where we may refer to such terms, 
there is currently no globally accepted 
framework or definition (legal, 
regulatory or otherwise) of, nor market 
consensus as to what constitutes, an 
‘ESG’, ‘green’, ‘sustainable’, ‘climate 
friendly’ or an equivalent company, 
investment, strategy or consideration 
or what precise attributes are required 
to be eligible to be categorised by such 
terms. This means there are different 
ways to evaluate a company or an 
investment and so different values may 
be placed on certain ESG credentials as 
well as adverse ESG-related impacts 
of companies and ESG controversies 
where these are considered.
The evolving nature of ESG 
considerations, models and 
methodologies means it can be 
challenging to definitively and 
universally classify a company or 
investment under an ESG label and 
there may be areas where such 
companies and investments could 
improve or where adverse ESG-related 
impacts or ESG controversies exist. 
The evolving nature of sustainable 
finance related regulations and the 
development of jurisdiction-specific 
regulatory criteria also means that 
there is likely to be a degree of 
divergence as to the interpretation of 
such terms in the market. We expect 
industry guidance, market practice, 
and regulations in this field to continue 
to evolve.
Any references to ‘sustainable’, 
‘sustainable investment’, ‘ESG’, ‘ESG 
data’ or other similar terms or related 
exclusions in this article are not to 
any jurisdiction-specific regulatory 
definition or other interpretation of 
these terms unless specified otherwise.
Discretionary Portfolio Management: 
Where we refer to screening processes, 
there is currently no market consensus, 
universally accepted framework (legal, 
regulatory or otherwise), criteria 
or purely objective way to select 
investments for sustainable strategies. 
We use multiple screening processes 
and analyse a number of factors in our 
investment selection process that we 
consider relevant in accordance with 
our internally defined criteria.
Where we have referred to investment 
selection processes, these include 
subjective elements which require 
us to consider whether, on balance, a 
particular investment is appropriate 
for inclusion in a sustainable strategy 
based on our criteria, available 
information (including ESG data) and 
professional judgement. Further, ESG 
considerations are rapidly evolving and 
may vary by sector/industry, market 
trends, current science or academic 
thought, and the macro environment.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
36
Other disclaimers: 
In preparing the climate disclosures and 
sustainability-related content within 
the Barclays Bank PLC TCFD Report 
wherever it appears, we have:
•	 Made certain key judgements, 
estimations and assumptions. This 
is, for example, the case in relation 
to measurement of climate risk and 
scenario analysis.
•	 Used climate data, models, scenarios 
and methodologies we consider 
to be appropriate and suitable for 
these purposes as at the date on 
which they were deployed. This 
includes data, models, scenarios and 
methodologies made available by 
third parties (over which we have no 
control) and which may have been 
prepared using a range of different 
methodologies, or where the basis 
of preparation may not be known to 
us. Methodologies, interpretations 
or assumptions may not be capable 
of being independently verified 
and may therefore be inaccurate. 
Climate data, models, scenarios 
and methodologies are subject to 
future risks and uncertainties and 
may change over time. Climate 
disclosures and sustainability-
related content in this document, 
including climate-related data, 
models and methodologies, 
are not of the same standard as 
those available in the context of 
other financial information and 
use a greater number and level 
of judgements, assumptions 
and estimates, including with 
respect to the classification of 
climate and sustainable financing 
activities. Climate disclosures and 
sustainability-related content are 
also not subject to the same or 
equivalent disclosure standards, 
historical reference points, 
benchmarks or globally accepted 
accounting principles. Historical 
data cannot be relied on as a strong 
indicator of future trajectories 
in the case of climate change 
and its evolution. Outputs of 
models, processed data, scenario 
analysis and the application of 
methodologies will also be affected 
by underlying data quality, which can 
be hard to assess, or challenges in 
accessing data on a timely basis.
•	 Continued (and will continue) to 
review and develop our approach 
to data, models, scenarios 
and methodologies in line with 
market principles and standards 
as this subject area matures. 
The data, models, scenarios and 
methodologies used (including 
those made available by third 
parties) and the judgements, 
estimates and/or assumptions 
made in them or by us are rapidly 
evolving, and this may directly or 
indirectly affect the metrics and 
data points contained in the climate 
disclosures and sustainability-
related content within this report. 
Further, changes in external factors 
which are outside of our control 
such as accounting and/or reporting 
standards, improvements in data 
quality, data availability, or updates 
to methodologies and models 
and/ or updates or restatements 
of data by third parties, could 
impact – potentially materially – 
the performance metrics and data 
points , targets, convergence points 
and milestones contained in the 
climate and sustainability content 
within this report. In future reports 
we may present some or all of 
the information for this reporting 
period (including information made 
available by third parties) using 
updated or more granular data 
or improved models, scenarios 
methodologies, market practices 
or standards. Such updated 
information may result in different 
outcomes than those included in this 
report. It is important for readers of 
this report to be aware that direct, 
like-for-like comparisons of each 
piece of information disclosed may 
not always be possible from one 
reporting period to another.
•	 Included in the TCFD Report graphs, 
text boxes and an illustrative case 
study and other credentials which 
aim to give a high-level overview of 
certain elements of the climate and 
sustainability content within this 
report and improve accessibility 
for readers, and are designed to be 
read within the context of the report 
as a whole. There are a variety of 
internal and external factors which 
may impact the reported metrics 
contained within the report.
This report: (i) has been prepared by 
Barclays Bank PLC and is provided 
for information purposes only and 
is subject to change.  References to 
Barclays means any entity within the 
Barclays Group of companies, where 
“Barclays Group” means Barclays 
and its affiliates, subsidiaries and 
undertakings;
(ii) Is not research nor a product of 
the Barclays Research department. 
Any views expressed in this report 
may differ from those of the Barclays 
Research department. All opinions and 
estimates are given as of the date of 
this report and are subject to change. 
Barclays is not obliged to inform 
recipients of this report of any change 
to such opinions or estimates.
(iii) Is general in nature and does 
not take into account any specific 
investment objectives, financial 
situation or particular needs of any 
particular person.
(iv) Does not constitute an offer, an 
invitation or a recommendation to 
enter into any product or service and 
does not constitute investment advice, 
solicitation to buy or sell securities 
and/or a personal recommendation. 
Any entry into any product or service 
requires Barclays’ subsequent formal 
agreement which will be subject to 
internal approvals and execution of 
binding documents. 
(v) May not be reproduced, distributed 
or transmitted without the prior 
written permission of Barclays. (vi) Has 
not been reviewed or approved by any 
regulatory authority.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
37
(iv) any past or simulated past 
performance including back-testing, 
modelling or scenario analysis, or 
future projections contained in this 
communication is no indication 
as to future performance. No 
representation is made as to the 
accuracy of the assumptions made in 
this communication, or completeness 
of, any modelling, scenario analysis 
or back-testing. The value of any 
investment may also fluctuate as a 
result of market changes.
This report is not intended for 
distribution, publication, or use in any 
jurisdiction where such distribution, 
publication, or use would be unlawful, 
nor is it aimed at any person or entity 
to whom it would be unlawful for 
them to access. Law or regulation 
in certain countries may restrict the 
manner of distribution of this report 
and the availability of the products 
and services, and persons who come 
into possession of this publication are 
required to inform themselves of and 
observe such restrictions.
This report contains certain 
information (the “Information”) 
sourced from Sustainalytics, MSCI 
ESG Research LLC, or its affiliates 
or information providers (the “ESG 
Parties”). The Information may only be 
used for your internal or personal use, 
may not be reproduced or disseminated 
in any form and may not be used as 
a basis for or a component of any 
financial instruments or products 
or indices. Although they obtain 
information from sources they consider 
reliable, none of the ESG Parties 
warrants or guarantees the originality, 
accuracy and/or completeness, of any 
data herein and expressly disclaim 
all express or implied warranties, 
including those of merchantability and 
fitness for a particular purpose. None 
of the MSCI information is intended 
to constitute investment advice or a 
recommendation to make (or refrain 
from making) any kind of investment 
decision and may not be relied on 
as such, nor should it be taken as an 
indication or guarantee of any future 
performance, analysis, forecast or 
prediction. None of the ESG Parties 
shall have any liability for any errors 
or omissions in connection with any 
data herein, or any liability for any 
direct, indirect, special, punitive, 
consequential or any other damages 
(including lost profits) even if notified of 
the possibility of such damages.
About Barclays Bank PLC
Barclays Bank PLC is authorised by the 
Prudential Regulation Authority and 
regulated by the Financial Conduct 
Authority and the Prudential Regulation 
Authority (Financial Services Register 
No.122702) and is a member of the 
London Stock Exchange and Aquis. 
Registered in England. Registered No. 
1026167. Registered Office: 1 Churchill 
Place, London E14 5HP.


Introduction
Barclays PLC and 
Barclays Bank PLC
Private Bank DPM
Barclays Investment 
Managers
Calculation 
methodology
Data limitations
Principal 
Investments
Glossary of 
key terms
Barclays Bank PLC
TCFD Report 2025
38
IBIM12100 May 2025
